SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JGoren who wrote (59047)1/25/2007 1:00:45 PM
From: manalagi  Respond to of 196977
 
Has the company stopped selling puts as a way of share buy back? I don't see any conflict with that approach. The shareholders who buy the puts are well aware of willing to sell the stock at a predetermined price and they have control as when to sell.



To: JGoren who wrote (59047)1/25/2007 1:32:57 PM
From: bdog  Respond to of 196977
 
"I think criticism is unwarranted and Qcom should be congratulated for its approach."

I think their approach is goofy. Deciding to implement a buy back program is totally appropriate. How and when the purchases are made is the issue. Purchasing shares on a programmed, non-discretionary basis is the essential ingredient to avoid ethical challenges vis a vis what the company arguably knew and the street did not.



To: JGoren who wrote (59047)1/25/2007 10:17:35 PM
From: carranza2  Respond to of 196977
 
A very kind poster sent me a PM indicating that the issue is not necessarily ethical, as Keitel has suggested, but legal.

He referred me to Rule 10b-18, a safe harbor provision for share buybacks. But even following the safe harbor provisions to the letter - and they are quite complex - won't insulate a co. engaged in a buy back program from 10b-5 liability.

Ethical issue? Well, sure, whatever. I think Keitel either didn't know of 10b-18 or may have been fudging a bit.