SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (214678)1/25/2007 1:42:09 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Did Rush express brumars views on Michael J. Fox?

I was so ready for Fox to make a sarcastic 'Biff' comment... The timing was perfect; never happened though.



To: michael97123 who wrote (214678)1/25/2007 1:46:23 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Brumar is obsessed with this as so many cons are.

It may have crossed over into the realm of a paranoia.

jttmab



To: michael97123 who wrote (214678)1/25/2007 1:47:50 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
RE. the NYT their science section (on Tuesday if I remember) is quite good.

The Wa Post is a much more professional paper imo.



To: michael97123 who wrote (214678)1/25/2007 2:02:52 PM
From: mistermj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
What about rt wing control of talk radio

Its all about eyeballs and ears.

Audience numbers for standard MSM (NY Times,LA Times, ABC, NBC,CBS) dwarfs talk radio numbers.

Talk radio and Fox are often the only dissenting voice in a major market.

I see first hand how a one newspaper town like Milwaukee has stories spiked and an overwhelming left wing bias to the news.

They also own the largest market share TV station in the city.

Talk radio is is often the ONLY way to find out about city corruption.