Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (59075)	1/25/2007 6:16:10 PM
From: waitwatchwander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197351

I always thought that is what it meant and tried to stay clear of all the "legal" discussions until they gelled into ... something I could understand. Thanx The fact that Nokia has this option and other don't doesn't seem very FRANDLY. I can understand TI's position but wonder why others farther back in the pack aren't complaining. I guess they've all got their own UNFRANDLY pieces and see being quiet as their best course of action. The best one can say about all this is that it shouldn't be surprising to anyone for matters to progress just as you (and Paul) have noted and, in the end, all that is going to happen is Nokia's money (less legal, of course) is going to be bankrolled until the issue is forced. Given the terms of the extension one would have to wonder ... What were they thinking? Oh well, was Altman a good Little Leaguer? You folks have probably already been up, down and all over town on this issue so I'll leave it in wonderment ...