SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (17007)1/26/2007 10:56:01 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Re: "reasonably suspected of being complicit in the deaths of over fifty people?"

Gee... our *own* serial murderer, actually EXCEEDING the death toll of that young puppy up in Canada with his relatively wimpy toll of *only* 49 prostitutes killed.

YA AMERICA!

WAY TO GO!

(Put them Canucks in their place.... :-)

Re: "I would not vote for anyone who lied over 200 times in a deposition unless the opponent was more dishonest."

Personally, Peter, I vastly prefer my politicians to LIE TO ME face-to-face, over the television screen!

THAT WAY they can reach MILLIONS upon MILLIONS with their lies... (not a pitiful couple of hundred in a court action.)



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (17007)1/28/2007 3:14:59 AM
From: RMF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71588
 
So you'd vote for ANY Republican (other than Duke Cunningham) rather than Hillary Clinton.

Good to see that you're open minded on your voting..

WHO are you talking about when you talk about a "person who is reasonably suspected of being complicit in the deaths of over fifty people"? Huh???