Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (758144)	1/26/2007 3:12:52 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

"iran clearly will not be excluded from our sights as this mess plays itself out..." No doubt... (especially since they exist. :-) "sri lanka is also not mentioned, but does that really matter? I think not..." Little Sri lanka does NOT represent one side of the two-sided inter-Islamic religious war (analogous to Catholicism / Protestantism in the pre-Reformation days of Europe). 'Sri lanka' does not refer to a large, downtrodden, and often much-despised religious minority scattered throughout the oil producing regions of the Gulf Arab States. 'Sri lanka' does not refer to the religion of the majority of Iraq's citizens, more then 90% of Persians, large 'blocking' minorities in Lebanon and elsewhere, and the ruling (minority) sect of Syria. So... YES, it surely does matter when some duffus AUTOMATICALLY ASSUMES that the Shiites & Persians either don't exist, or else will HAVE NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT the possibility of Whabbist Sunni Islam 'taking over the entire Middle East and then the world'! (The Shiites have been 'caring' about that possibility for CENTURIES... so I see no objective evidence suggesting that they won't 'care' now. LOL!) To put that particular article forward as 'responsible' or 'important' is just LaLa Land. The guy doesn't even know who the major players are....