To: forceOfHabit who wrote (78213 ) 1/26/2007 4:44:39 PM From: ahhaha Respond to of 110194 Get a book on fundamental analysis. Read it. Many of the same principles that apply to business accounting / financial management apply to your personal circumstances. "Cash flow" is but one important metric of the health and viability of any enterprise, including your own finances. Maybe you'd like to answer the question of what is the alternative to "cash flow" oriented. You don't actually invest any thought into your evasion of challenges to your claims, do you. Then maybe you'd like to reveal your cash asset ratio.An entertaining non sequitur. What's the matter? Afraid to reveal your own indebtedness? Hardly non sequitur, hypocrite. As a matter of fact, I would be perfectly happy to tell you that ratio if I thought it was relevant, but it would of course be meaningless without some idea of my risk appetite, leverage, risk management etc. Hmmm. Sounds like a "cash flow" rationalization. That's what you do when challenged. You run away to hide your hypocrisy. Your risk appetite. What a clown. Do you really think you can use someone else's mistaken mischaracterization and get away with it with me? Please define "risk appetite". You won't do that because if you tried, I'd tear you to bits, that is if there is anything left in your prattle.In fact, since I run more or less market neutral, you'd have to tell me what you meant by the asset part of "cash asset ratio". Get a book on fundamental analysis. Read it.In fact, I think that would be a great topic for a board here on SI: risk management. In fact, set it up so I can expose you to be a half wit hack SI amateur fool who has no business shooting off his damn yap with claims about how people ought not be "cash flow" oriented. You're a hypocrite, boy. Where else do I smell your type? 'cratland, and you are a 'crat artist. We could talk about the use of stops Nothing to do with risk management but everything to do with trading. Better take more FA because risk is proportional to return. Trading seeks to avoid risk. Maybe you can reach the implications. (personally, I think actual stops are an invitation to be gamed by the market makers, You should shut your yap before you embarrass yourself any further. Gamed by market makers? Listen to this guy, Grace. He's the guy who is telling me to read some book on FA!mental stops are essential), leverage (imho very useful), options (from the point of view of managing risk, not for expressing a view), diversification (over-rated imho), position limits, scaling, maximum drawdown, whatever. And you claim not to be "cash flow" oriented? What a deceiver. You deceive yourself, amateur. Must be you're merely a hypocrite. I don't have huge amounts of time to spend here, but I'd welcome the chance to skim other people's thoughts on the topic. Get a book on fundamental analysis. Read it.