SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sylvester80 who wrote (74008)1/26/2007 9:20:04 PM
From: coug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
re: "Gonzalez"

I caught part of that match and he was awesome.. If he is on his game, he will give Federer a run for his money..



To: sylvester80 who wrote (74008)1/26/2007 10:36:59 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Gonzalez will go all out against Federer in Aussie final

chron.com

<<...MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA - The logic goes like this: Fernando Gonzalez can beat Rafael Nadal, and Nadal has beaten Roger Federer. Why can't Gonzalez upset Federer in the Australian Open final?

The facts go like this: Gonzalez is 0-9 against Federer.

Still, Gonzalez is not without hope Sunday against a No. 1 player who won three majors last year and is going for his 10th Grand Slam title.

Gonzalez has a strong forehand, plenty of nerve and a revitalized game under a new coach. He is ranked No. 10, and he's not called Speedy for nothing.

Gonzalez overpowered Tommy Haas 6-1, 6-3, 6-1 in the semifinals Friday, winning the first 11 points and not making an unforced error in the first and third sets to reach his first Grand Slam final.

Federer routed No. 6 Andy Roddick 6-4, 6-0, 6-2 Thursday night, calling it his best match ever in Melbourne.

"He's the No. 1 player in the world by far. ... I lost many times with him," Gonzalez said. "But now I'm playing much better than the last time we played. And it's only one match. I'm going to give everything that I have to try to win my first Slam."

The rifling forehand that Gonzalez used in his straight-sets quarterfinal upset of No. 2 Nadal was again on display against No. 12 Haas, who is 0-3 in Australian Open semifinals.

The Chilean pounded 18 forehand winners, some with a low, flat trajectory that barely grazed the net and others that looped and curled inside the lines. He had 42 winners in all, and only three unforced errors.

Haas said everything he tried backfired, and everything Gonzalez did seemed to work.

"I just have to tip the hat, say that's too good tonight," Haas said. "Nothing I could have done."

Federer has won nine of his 10 major finals. His victory over Roddick put him into a seventh consecutive Grand Slam final, tying a record set in 1934 by Jack Crawford.

In the women's final Saturday, reigning U.S. Open champion Maria Sharapova faces Serena Williams, unseeded and ranked No. 81 after long stretches on the sidelines with a knee problem since winning the last of her seven majors in Australia two years ago.

Williams saved match points against Sharapova in the semifinals here in 2005 and then beat Lindsay Davenport in the final. Between that win and this tournament, she had not beaten a top 10 player and was a long shot at Melbourne Park.

"That's always fun," she said. "I've had a lot of comebacks in this tournament. I went from rock bottom to, 'Hey, there she is again.' I don't have anything to lose. But I try to play every tournament like that."

Her fall from the top of women's tennis — when she completed her Serena Slam by winning four consecutive majors from the French Open in 2002 to the Australian in 2003 — coincided with the start of Federer's ascent.

Williams said it would be nice to match the seemingly untouchable Federer now.

"That would be the ultimate experience," she said. "He's definitely like a role model to me."

Federer has topped the rankings for three years, and Gonzalez understands how high the bar has now been set.

"I'm playing the most important match in my life and he's the best player of the last many years. He's winning all the time," Gonzalez said. "He has to lose sometime. I'm going to try to do it on Sunday."

Gonzalez has improved his temperament, his backhand — where he once felt "a hole" on his left side — and his shot selection. The turnaround started last May when he began working with Larry Stefanki, who previously coached John McEnroe, Marcelo Rio and Yevgeny Kafelnikov.

In this event, Gonzalez has beaten former No. 1 Lleyton Hewitt, No. 5 James Blake and Nadal and is no longer vulnerable on big points. He has come a long way since his first-round exit last year, when he was seeded ninth and lost to American qualifier Alex Bogomolov Jr. in five sets.

"I cramped. I lost against a qualifier, playing really bad tennis. Maybe the worst match in my life. Not maybe; I think was," Gonzalez said. "Maybe I was here like three or four days. Now I'm here like three weeks. It's really nice."

Haas said Federer could be in a bit of trouble if Gonzalez keeps his rhythm.

"If he can maintain the level he showed tonight and the last couple of matches ... the stats speak for themselves," he said. "If he can make very few unforced errors, play like he did tonight, I think it would be a good match, and we'll see what happens."

Gonzalez' last two losses to Federer were in finals — at Basel and Madrid late last season. Federer lost only five matches in 2006, including four in finals to Nadal. Against everyone else, he was 91-1.

Gonzalez promised to use the same tactics that rattled Nadal and Hewitt.

"I never beat him, but in tennis you always have a new opportunity," Gonzalez said. "I have a really nice opportunity now."...>>



To: sylvester80 who wrote (74008)1/27/2007 6:01:27 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
In Top Shape, González Aims to Topple Federer
___________________________________________________________

By CHRISTOPHER CLAREY

THE NEW YORK TIMES

MELBOURNE, Saturday, Jan. 27 — Roger Federer has already snuffed out the hopes here of one longtime foil who thought that his improved backhand, soaring confidence and new American coach might help him break the habit of losing to the world’s No. 1 player.

Now, Federer will be favored to do the same to Fernando González of Chile in the men’s final of the Australian Open on Sunday.

Like Andy Roddick, González has been gathering momentum in recent months. He is now in the form of his life and Friday, one night after Federer crushed Roddick in the semifinals, González was as brutally efficient in his semifinal against Tommy Haas of Germany.

While Federer allowed Roddick only six games, González allowed Haas only five, winning, 6-1, 6-3, 6-1.

At least González has an edge in one category as he heads into his first Grand Slam final against a man who has already won nine of them.

“He’s winning all the time; he has to lose sometimes,” González said of Federer. “I’m going to try to do it on Sunday.”

Haas had already beaten two members of the top 10 — David Nalbandian and Nikolay Davydenko — on his way to the semifinals. But he could not get so much as a break point against the 10th-seeded González, who had his way from all parts of the court.

“Pretty similar to Roger last night,” Haas said, accepting his defeat with the same good grace that Roddick accepted his.

Jim Courier, who won the Australian Open in 1992 and 1993, has a good term for beatings like these. He calls them “bone crushings,” and it will be intriguing to see whether González, who has never beaten Federer in nine previous matches, can produce something more compelling than Federer’s latest straight-set victory in the final.

“Roger’s the No. 1 player in the world by far,” González said. “He’s the favorite. I lost many times with him, but I’m playing much better than the last time we played, and it’s only one match.”

At 26, González is late to make this sort of breakthrough. Until now, the highlight of his career was winning the men’s doubles with his compatriot Nicolas Massu at the 2004 Summer Olympics. Their gold medal was the first for Chile in any sport, and Massu followed it up by taking the gold in the singles, too, and González settled for bronze.

But González has shaken up his personal life and professional life in the past eight months, dating the Argentine tour player Gisela Dulko and hiring the veteran coach Larry Stefanki, a Californian who once helped the Russian Yevgeny Kafelnikov and González’ fellow Chilean Marcelo Rios reach No. 1 in the world.

“Always I was playing the same and same,” González said. “I needed to do some other things.”

It has been a question of improving shot selection and technique; it has been a question of the confidence and new energy that a change can bring. Since fighting off the towering and promising Juan Martin del Potro of Argentina in the second round, González has been close to untouchable, beating four members of the top 20 with the loss of only one set.

He has beaten a grinder: the former world No. 1 Lleyton Hewitt. He has beaten two aggressive baseliners with asymmetric, forehand-based games: the second-seeded Rafael Nadal and the fifth-seeded James Blake. He has also beaten an all-court threat with a more balanced approach: the 12th-seeded Haas.

González has done it all in grand style, and he was at his grandest against Haas, finishing with a slightly surreal three unforced errors and 42 winners.

“I’ve been playing many years with 45 unforced errors and three winners,” González joked, referring to his high-risk former style. “So now I try to work a little more the points. I can run better, can play five sets if I want.”

Rios, now retired, was a surly left-hander with tremendous touch and a fragile physique who lost in the 1998 Australian Open final to Petr Korda. González is a much more affable sort with a swashbuckling style defined by his bazooka of a forehand, a natural shot that has generated gasps from spectators when they have seen (and heard) it firsthand.

There were still plenty of huge forehands Friday against Haas, the 28-year-old who also lost in the semifinals here in 1999 and 2002. But González, with blocks of Chilean fans dancing and chanting inside and outside Rod Laver Arena, also came up with plenty of other masterstrokes: leaping high for backhand overheads, sprinting forward to answer a good drop shot with a better one, whipping up on the ball to hit a topspin lob winner and serving big, very big, to the corners.

He also teased errors from Haas with his now-versatile backhand. In recent years, González often tried to hit it as hard as his forehand, but he has tempered that impulse now that he has improved and simplified the shot.

“When I started working with Fernando, I asked him, ‘Why do you play like that?’ ” Stefanki said, referring to his tendency to go for broke with his ground strokes. “He told me that he just knew if the rally went on for long, he’d miss on the backhand side.”

One of Stefanki’s techniques is to improve his players’ upper-body control so they improve their margin for error as they move toward contact. “Roger is a good example, because he moves with the lower body, but his upper body is still on both sides,” Stefanki said.

He emphasizes 2-player-on-1 drills to get his charges accustomed to a higher rate of speed and reaction. “It has to feel like slow motion when the ball is moving along at 130 miles an hour in a match,” Stefanki said.

Slowing down Federer remains the ultimate challenge, however, and unless González can maintain his celestial level in the wondrous new world of a Grand Slam final, it is hardly a stretch to imagine Federer successfully defending his Australian Open title.



To: sylvester80 who wrote (74008)1/28/2007 2:28:26 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Bush Is About to Attack Iran
____________________________________________________________

Why Can't Americans See it?

by Paul Craig Roberts*

January 27, 2007

The American public and the US Congress are getting their backs up about the Bush Regime's determination to escalate the war in Iraq. A massive protest demonstration is occurring in Washington DC today, and Congress is expressing its disagreement with Bush's decision to intensify the war in Iraq.

This is all to the good. However, it misses the real issue – the Bush Regime's looming attack on Iran.

Rather than winding down one war, Bush is starting another. The entire world knows this and is discussing Bush's planned attack on Iran in many forums. It is only Americans who haven't caught on. A few senators have said that Bush must not attack Iran without the approval of Congress, and postings on the Internet demonstrate world wide awareness that Iran is in the Bush Regime's cross hairs. But Congress and the Media – and the demonstration in Washington – are focused on Iraq.

What can be done to bring American awareness up to the standard of the rest of the world?

In Davos, Switzerland, the meeting of the World Economic Forum, a conference where economic globalism issues are discussed, opened January 24 with a discussion of Bush's planned attack on Iran. The Secretary General of the League of Arab States and bankers and businessmen from such US allies as Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates all warned of the coming attack and its catastrophic consequences for the Middle East and the world.

Writing for Global Research, General Leonid Ivashov, vice president of the Academy on Geopolitical Affairs and former Joint Chief of Staff of the Russian Armies, forecasted an American nuclear attack on Iran by the end of April. General Ivashov presented the neoconservative reasoning that is the basis for the attack and concluded that the world's protests cannot stop the US attack on Iran.

There will be shock and indignation, General Ivashov concludes, but the US will get away with it. He writes:

"Within weeks from now, we will see the informational warfare machine start working. The public opinion is already under pressure. There will be a growing anti-Iranian militaristic hysteria, new information leaks, disinformation, etc.... The probability of a US aggression against Iran is extremely high. It does remain unclear, though, whether the US Congress is going to authorize the war. It may take a provocation to eliminate this obstacle (an attack on Israel or the US targets including military bases). The scale of the provocation may be comparable to the 9/11 attack in NY. Then the Congress will certainly say 'Yes' to the US president."

The Bush Regime has made it clear that it is convinced that Bush already has the authority to attack Iran. The Regime argues that the authority is part of Bush's commander-in-chief powers. Congress has authorized the war in Iraq, and Bush's recent public statements have shifted the responsibility for the Iraqi insurgency from al-Qaeda to Iran. Iran, Bush has declared, is killing US troops in Iraq. Thus, Iran is covered under the authorization for the war in Iraq.

Both Bush and Cheney have made it clear in public statements that they will ignore any congressional opposition to their war plans. For example, CBS News reported (Jan. 25) that Cheney said that a congressional resolution against escalating the war in Iraq "won't stop us." According to the Associated Press, Bush dismissed congressional disapproval with his statement, "I'm the decision-maker."

Everything is in place for an attack on Iran. Two aircraft carrier attack forces are deployed to the Persian Gulf, US attack aircraft have been moved to Turkey and other countries on Iran's borders, Patriot anti-missile defense systems are being moved to the Middle East to protect oil facilities and US bases from retaliation from Iranian missiles, and growing reams of disinformation alleging Iran's responsibility for the insurgency in Iraq are being fed to the gullible US media.

General Ivashof and everyone in the Middle East and at the Davos globalization conference in Europe understands the Bush Regime's agenda.

Why cannot Americans understand?

Why hasn't Congress told Bush and Cheney that they will both be instantly impeached if they initiate a wider war?

antiwar.com

*Paul Craig Roberts wrote the Kemp-Roth bill and was assistant secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration.
He was associate editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and contributing editor of National Review.
He is author or co-author of eight books, including The Supply-Side Revolution (Harvard University Press).



To: sylvester80 who wrote (74008)1/28/2007 4:23:53 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
some AMAZING tennis is on right now on ESPN...Gonzalez (from Chile) is ahead of Federer 5-4 in the first set...This match could go either way...;-)