Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bart13 who wrote (78217)	1/26/2007 10:06:46 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

In the modern era inflation is defined as acceleration of the general price level(roroc of GPL). Lots of dictionaries and economists think otherwise, or have additional definitions that are more precise. You should study what I've stated. Your authorities won't talk to you, but I have, and I have given you what is above them. In fact, the chart shows the 2.4% rising structural rate of general price level(the straight line of zero slope) and the current era's definition of inflation(acceleration or deceleration, rising and falling of graphed function). Which means pretty much nothing. I can take all sorts of bad data and make bad charts too. You've already established that. Your chart doesn't show that. Your chart purportedly shows rate of change of secLend vs Tbond yield. On the face of it please tell me how you think your chart shows any correlation. Considering that you don't see it visually, there's not much I can say. Why not answer the question rather than run away? Have you tried taking the raw data which is eminently available in say, economagic, and running a correlation coefficient on it? No, you haven't done that. You prefer to find faces on Mars, and other fanciful imaginings. I have no idea where you get the idea there's some relationship I'm positing between SecLend and temp and perm, etc. That you don't know the relationship of Permanent, Temporary, and secLend, I'm not surprised. The rest of your statement has little or nothing to do with SecLend or my point that CPI is hugely understated. There's no connection between secLend, CPI, and TBond. The historical record is quite clear about this. To anyone's eye your chart shows no correlation between Tbond and secLend. What the hell are you imagining? Do you know what secLend is? Let me answer. No, you don't. Just another babbling fool looking for support for baseless fears. Why do you go on with these silly myths especially in face of the mountain of data contradicting them?