Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (6109)	1/27/2007 2:40:11 PM
From: Sirius_Rich	Respond to of 8420

>>>Sirius Rich, who doesn't have the gumption to slap his ass with both hands. What's the matter David, lose another argument? Again.

To: i-node who wrote (6109)	1/27/2007 4:31:36 PM
From: pcstel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8420

The argument began when we were discussing PAC versus AACPlus. LOL!! When were we discussing PAC versus AACPlus???? When was that?? You are confused.. You have been discussing PAC vs. AACPlus with yourself. The discussion started when you claimed that XM had 30% more capacity than SIRI. I noted that this was based on a 2002 XM Press Release. And since that time.. SIRI had announced (Links provided) other advancements in technology that have obviously leveled the playing field since SIRI is now claiming 3 Video/Audio plus existing Audio channels. That's when you went off on your Internet Chat Buddie with the "inflateable modulation analyzer" cockamamy posts.. So to recap.. I have never discounted the PAC versus AACPlus efficiencies. I simply stated that given the announcements that SIRI has made.. There appears there is no longer a 30% difference in capacity that one can tell by the services offered. You can argue with the facts all day long, and shout louder than me, but you are not right and are unable to make yourself admit you are wrong. Please provide a post where I have opined that PAC was superior to AACPlus?? You have been proven wrong. Beyond wrong. ROTFLMAO! You claim I am WRONG about something that I have never debated. Dude.. You have been carrying on that argument with yourself!! LOL! And so it goes, PCSTEL

To: i-node who wrote (6109)	1/27/2007 6:20:00 PM
From: HEXonX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8420

I must say this debate is getting quite technical. Next thing you know, PCStel and Frontmed will start comparing Ham Radio licenses, what class, how long and how many QSL cards they have. LOL!!! Maybe Frontmed has accumulated vast Cosmic knowledge sitting in his Orgone Accumulator a bit too long.