SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (323253)1/27/2007 4:41:44 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1576130
 
re: Its so ingrained in someone like Tim that he doesn't see the wrongness of that statement nor does he realize that it does little for him as a member of the middle class.

The worship of the free market systems does seem to have a religious tone to it for people like Tim. The "free market" will determine the ultimate good; sort of like a literal interpretation of the Bible by fundamentalist Christians. Every answer is there.

Good news is that Tim is fringe; not too many folks think like that.

Most people muddle along trying to find pragmatic solutions to problems without an ideological bias. It often doesn't seem that way...



To: tejek who wrote (323253)1/27/2007 6:37:39 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576130
 
"what's good for GM is good for the nation"

"Engine" Charley gets misquoted a lot.

What he said was much more benign.

What’s good for the country is good for General Motors, and vice versa

bartleby.com

"Since that wasn't quite true and since GM is now a God awful mess, that quote was changed under Reagan to read: "what's good for the rich is good for the nation"......"

Anybody remember the show "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous"? It is no accident that was on during the Reagan administration.



To: tejek who wrote (323253)1/29/2007 5:48:23 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1576130
 
This notion that the rich are sacred and must be preserved and pampered

Support of the free market is rather different than desiring that the rich be preserved and pampered. If they are preserved and pampered they don't have to face the market, they can just rely on the pampering.

Too often the rich either are connected to the government, or have the influence to get such pampering. Defenders of the free market oppose protecting the rich from having to compete.