Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (28241)	1/28/2007 1:46:34 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Nice try, math, but you are forgetting that he in no way said that the Individual List "hold" recommendation included the QQQ "positions" that his subscribers were holding as per his countertrend rally buys--EVER! MOF: He went to great lengths to show the difference. He repeated this EVERY MONTH from November 2000-June 2001: "All of the individual issues on our list are currently rated "hold" except the Nasdaq 100 Shares (QQQ), which are recommended within the guidelines listed on page one of this newsletter. Then as you pointed out, in June 2001, he stopped and simply said all "issues are a hold." But, he still continued to differentiate between those holding "positions" and the "List" by offering follow up advice in the heart of his newsletter--each month until March of 2003. Advice such as this: "For subscribers with a position in Nasdaq 100 Index (QQQ)shares, we recommend holding these shares for future recovery within our earlier percentage guidelines." For him to have continued to point out that there was a difference would have been redundant, because by this time, the poor "guru" was not offering anything new about the Qs on "Page One, or Page Two." He'd already issued three separate starting points for the big countertrend rallies. LOL . .