To: GraceZ who wrote (78245 ) 1/29/2007 9:57:26 AM From: forceOfHabit Respond to of 110194 Grace,It was a flip remark, I apologise if you took it to heart...It did at least get you to do some investigation. So your goal in posting is to make flippant assertions, so patently false they induce incredulous readers to spend all of 5 minutes "investigating" them to detail their absurdity? OK, whatever.I just couldn't believe someone on a financial board was asking me for proof that Americans have high net worth (relative to the world). Should have gone with your instincts: no one was asking for any such thing.Here read the study yourself, my figures are the exchange rate figures from Table 10a pg47....if you need to feel poorer you can use the PPP figures from Table 11a on pg49:wider.unu.edu . An excellent reference, thanks for providing it. So presumably we have both learned your original estimate Having a net worth of $5,000 puts you ahead of 98% of the world's population. was way off? (By more than a factor of 30; in fact, according to your source, not even a net worth of $150,000 would accomplish this.)I think you will find that my original statement stands that Americans have not hurt their net worth by being cash flow oriented. In the first place, that was not your original statement. It was:Yes, they do [Americans approach life as a cash flow proposition] and being cash flow oriented has given them a very high average net worth in comparison to the rest of the world. Simply, your original statement is that being cash flow oriented has caused Americans' relatively high average net worth. Your recent (re)statement is that being cash flow oriented has not harmed Americans' (implicitly: pre-existing) high net worth. In any case, since you offer no support for either statement, I think I'll just ignore them as more flippant remarks intended to "get [me] to investigate". No thanks, its not that important to me. This exchange has helped me form an opinion on how much weight to give your "facts", how seriously to consider your "insights", and how much time to spend reading your posts. Best of luck with, ummm, well whatever it is you do. foh