SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (215400)1/29/2007 10:05:26 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
By opposing birth control, RU486 and PV on the one hand, while not pursuing a govt system to take care of the unwanted and harmed children that are produced is moral cowardice of the worst kind.

And to be fair, its the same for the extreme pro choice folks who not only cant accept the fetus as clearly human when viewing an ultrasound, but refuse to put any limitations at all on something as horrific as partical birth abortions.

Again as i have previously stated, the vast majority of the american people agree with me, regardless of how they label themselves. How about some pro-common sense for a change?



To: jttmab who wrote (215400)1/29/2007 10:48:40 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"I saw in another link that it wasn't even a close vote. You try to reduce unwanted pregnancies and abortions and there are plenty of nuts who throw obstacles in front of you."

The bible-thumpers don't want to interfere in the "miracle" of human birth. It wouldn't be following God's plan..


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News