To: LoneClone who wrote (31229 ) 1/29/2007 4:29:01 PM From: Mr. Aloha Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78417 FWIW, here's another perspective from the Stockhouse board. Has any other mine ever used this ACB approach, or is it unproven, making financing less likely?Hey guys, I'm a long term investor in RDV, but something here smells. To get approval (permiting) to transport on a river (two rivers) is NO small task, and it says, to me, management is in panic mode. Permitting: " In late 2006, the Company identified and developed an alternate access option, " That doesn't sound like they had been considering this option years ago. It sounds as though they found out late, the building of a road would have made the project non-feasible, and in a panic (not wanting to have ANOTHER non-feas released) they, "in late 2006" blert out "hey we're a'gunna take the river route". " Redcorp will make application to the BC Environmental Assessment Office to amend the existing Project Approval Certificate. Canadian federal government authorities will determine if there is any requirement to amend, " Will determine any needed amending? hmmmmm I wonder what they'll deterine......yes or no.....thats a tough one..........NOT ! The BC Environmental Assessment Office, yeah that should take 3 months....yeah datz it....... " This alternative is a transboundary route and therefore may require some formal process of review at the Alaskan State government level." Them too huh? 3 or 6 months tops... you betcha... " The Company believes that any necessary permitting amendments could be completed in three to six months " Are they saying that it would only take 3 to 6 months to get the government and ENVIRONMETALISTS to agree that hauling millions of tons of dirt and rock on two rivers would be a simple "amendment" to the existing permits ? Still long, but .....................