Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (215501)	1/30/2007 12:30:24 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

But they didn't and he didn't, so where's the case??? Well, that's exactly the point. Clinton didn't tell the truth, which obstructed justice. Which is exactly why the judge found him guilty, and why he lost his license, and paid a $90,000 fine for being in contempt of court and why he settled out of court with Jones. But the case, of course, came out eventually, although Bill was still lying through his teeth until the DNA on Monica's dress proved that he had ejaculated semen thereon. There's physical evidence for you. Any lawyer could have told him that he was dead meat, and no doubt, they did. So, he paid Jones $850,000. Where the case, indeed?