SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (215607)1/30/2007 4:18:11 PM
From: mistermj  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
You talk pretty smart for someone who hasn't discovered the benefits of the "paragraph".

Try it some time.

Maybe somebody will actually start reading your posts. I have no clue what you are trying to say.

At least you aren't all CAPS. There is hope.



To: GST who wrote (215607)1/30/2007 8:02:03 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
Bush administration accused of doctoring scientists' reports on climate change

guardian.co.uk



To: GST who wrote (215607)1/30/2007 8:31:19 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
"Holy cow!!!!

You think we've evolved? We keep upgrading tech and have some pretty elaborate toys but human beings suck as bad now as we ever have. We haven't risen to a higher continuum of humanity as far as I can see. ... Maybe the next generation will do better than the past but we'd have to break the mold for that.



To: GST who wrote (215607)1/30/2007 8:36:24 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
Inconvenient truth: Why Plame had to go

dailykos.com



To: GST who wrote (215607)1/30/2007 9:22:56 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
JUST IN: Scientists charge White House pressure on warming
Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:43 PM ET

By Deborah Zabarenko, Environment Correspondent
today.reuters.com

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. scientists were pressured to tailor their writings on global warming to fit the Bush administration's skepticism, in some cases at the behest of a former oil-industry lobbyist, a congressional committee heard on Tuesday.

"Our investigations found high-quality science struggling to get out," Francesca Grifo of the watchdog group Union of Concerned Scientists told members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

A survey by the group found that 150 climate scientists personally experienced political interference in the past five years, for a total of at least 435 incidents.

"Nearly half of all respondents perceived or personally experienced pressure to eliminate the words 'climate change,' 'global warming' or other similar terms from a variety of communications," Grifo said.

Rick Piltz, a former U.S. government scientist who said he resigned in 2005 after pressure to soft-pedal findings on global warming, told the committee in prepared testimony that former White House official Phil Cooney took an active role in casting doubt on the consequences of global climate change.

Cooney, who was a lobbyist for the American Petroleum Institute before becoming chief of staff at the White House Council on Environmental Quality, resigned in 2005 to work for oil giant ExxonMobil.

Documents on global climate change required Cooney's review and approval, Piltz said.

"His edits of program reports, which had been drafted and approved by career science program managers, had the cumulative effect of adding an enhanced sense of scientific uncertainty about global warming and minimizing its likely consequences," Piltz said.

Rep. Henry Waxman, a California Democrat who chairs the committee, complained that the White House has balked at supplying documents requested over six months to investigate these allegations.

"The committee isn't trying to obtain state secrets or documents that could affect our immediate national security," Waxman said. "We are simply seeking answers to whether the White House's political staff is inappropriately censoring impartial government scientists."

Kristen Hellmer of the Council on Environmental Quality said the council had been cooperating with Congress. When asked about allegations of political interference in scientific documents, she said, "We do have in place a very transparent system in science reporting."

The hearing was one of two on Tuesday spotlighting global climate change; a Senate forum featured testimony from members including presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois among Democrats and Republican John McCain of Arizona.

President George W. Bush's position on global warming has evolved over his presidency, from open skepticism about the reality of the phenomenon to acknowledgment at a global summit last year that climate change is occurring and human activities speed it up.

In his State of the Union address on January 23, Bush called climate change "a serious challenge" that should be addressed by technology and greater use of alternative sources of energy. But he stopped short of calling for mandatory limits on U.S. emissions of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas blamed in part for global warming.

These discussions are part of the run-up to release of a major United Nations report on climate change, scheduled for Friday in Paris. Drafts of the report strengthened the case that humans are the principal cause of global warming after 1950.