SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Honey_Bee who wrote (28332)1/30/2007 4:14:49 PM
From: queenleah  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 42834
 
honey demanded Queen, by what measure do you feel justified to say that fahrenheit451 is "fake?"

My measure is that, as I understand it, fakefahrenheit adopted math's former ID when math changed to a different ID. Anyone who "imps" another unique ID for whatever purposes is a phony in my book. What could the reasons be for someone to do that, other than nefarious and deceptive at worst, and classless and tacky at best?

As for the remainder of your first attack (for today):

Is that just another royal issuance from the royal throne located at the royal family bidness throne room?

By what measure do you feel justified to post to someone who's done nothing to you, with such purposeless and unprovoked invective and ineffective pugnacity? Could it be a symptom of "buttinski-itis" in this case?

I have to take off for an hour or so, but as always I await your comments with breathless anticipation. (Well, not "breathless", perhaps, but you know what I mean.)



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (28332)2/10/2007 12:33:22 AM
From: Math Junkie  Respond to of 42834
 
Queen, by what measure do you feel justified to say that fahrenheit451 is "fake?"

As the person who started the "Fake Fahrenheit" nomenclature, I can tell you that my reason was that when he started posting here he tried to pose as me by adopting the screen name I use at Suite 101. He even wrote one or two posts that hid his anti-Brinker stance. When I asked him if he was trying to make people think he was me, instead of answering he gave a justification for it (something about revenge, IIRC).