Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hoopsville who wrote (31367)	1/30/2007 10:37:49 PM
From: tyc:>	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78418

Your guess is as good as mine, but here's mine anyway. It's my opinion that the warrants have allowed a lot of hedging of the stock by institutions... i.e holding the warrants they can short the stock with impunity raising cash that they can use elsewhere. This has tended to kill speculative interest, and that lack of interest will enable the shorters to acquire the stock cheaply eventually. If you think the stock is as good as you say, what about the leverage offered by the warrants? If the stock doubles to 6.60 the warrants would have an intrinsic value of $1.60 which implies 3.6x its current price of .44c.