SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Threshold who wrote (74163)1/31/2007 12:33:07 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
I've always suspected Lieberman works for Mossad.



To: Threshold who wrote (74163)1/31/2007 2:59:14 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
The Neocons Have Learned Nothing from Five Years of Catastrophe
____________________________________________________________

Their zealous advocacy of the invasion of Iraq may have been a disaster, but now they want to do it all over again - in Iran

by Francis Fukuyama*

Published on Wednesday, January 31, 2007 by the Guardian / UK

The United States today spends approximately as much as the rest of the world combined on its military establishment. So it is worth pondering why it is that, after nearly four years of effort, the loss of thousands of American lives, and an outlay of perhaps half-a-trillion dollars, the US has not succeeded in pacifying a small country of some 24 million people, much less in leading it to anything that looks remotely like a successful democracy.

One answer is that the nature of global politics in the first decade of the 21st century has changed in important ways. Today's world, at least in that band of instability that runs from north Africa and through the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and central Asia, is characterised by numerous weak and sometimes failed states, and by transnational actors who are able to move fluidly across international borders, abetted by the same technological capabilities that produced globalisation. States such as Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Somalia, Palestine and a host of others are not able to exercise sovereign control over their territory, ceding power and influence to terrorist groups such as al-Qaida, political parties-cum-militias such as Hizbullah in Lebanon, or various ethnic and sectarian factions elsewhere.

American military doctrine has emphasised the use of overwhelming force, applied suddenly and decisively, to defeat the enemy. But in a world where insurgents and militias deploy invisibly among civilian populations, overwhelming force is almost always counterproductive: it alienates precisely those people who have to make a break with the hardcore fighters and deny them the ability to operate freely. The kind of counterinsurgency campaign needed to defeat transnational militias and terrorists puts political goals ahead of military ones, and emphasises hearts and minds over shock and awe.

A second lesson that should have been drawn from the past five years is that preventive war cannot be the basis of a long-term US nonproliferation strategy. The Bush doctrine sought to use preventive war against Iraq as a means of raising the perceived cost to would-be proliferators of approaching the nuclear threshold. Unfortunately, the cost to the US itself was so high that it taught exactly the opposite lesson: the deterrent effect of American conventional power is low, and the likelihood of preventive war actually decreases if a country manages to cross that threshold.

A final lesson that should have been drawn from the Iraq war is that the current US government has demonstrated great incompetence in its day-to-day management of policy. One of the striking things about the performance of the Bush administration is how poorly it has followed through in accomplishing the ambitious objectives it set for itself. In Iraq, the administration has acted like a patient with attention-deficit disorder. The US succeeded in organising efficiently for key events such as the handover of sovereignty on June 30 2004, or the elections of January 30 2005. But it failed to train Iraqi forces, failed to appoint ambassadors, failed to perform due diligence on contractors and, above all, failed to hold accountable those officials most responsible for these and other multiple failures.

This lack of operational competence could in theory be fixed over time, but it has important short-term consequences for American grand strategy. Neoconservative theorists saw America exercising a benevolent hegemony over the world, using its enormous power wisely and decisively to fix problems such as terrorism, proliferation, rogue states, and human-rights abuses. But even if friends and allies were inclined to trust America's good intentions, it would be hard for them not to be dismayed at the actual execution of policy and the amount of broken china this particular bull left behind.

The failure to absorb Iraq's lessons has been evident in the neoconservative discussion of how to deal with Iran's growing regional power, and its nuclear programme. Iran today constitutes a huge challenge for the US, as well as for America's friends in the Middle East. Unlike al-Qaida, Iran is a state, deeply rooted historically (unlike Iraq) and flush with resources as a result of energy price rises. It is ruled by a radical Islamist regime that - particularly since Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's election in June 2005 - has turned in a disturbingly intolerant and aggressive direction.

The US unintentionally abetted Iran's regional rise by invading Iraq, eliminating the Ba'athist regime as a counterweight, and empowering Shia parties close to Tehran. It seems reasonably clear that Iran wants nuclear weapons, despite protestations that its nuclear programme is only for civilian purposes; nuclear energy makes little sense for a country sitting on some of the world's largest oil reserves, but it makes sense as the basis for a weapons programme. It is completely rational for the Iranians to conclude that they will be safer with a bomb than without one.

It is easy to outline the obstacles to a negotiated end to the Iranian programme, but much harder to come up with an alternative strategy. Use of force looks very unappealing. The US is hardly in a position to invade and occupy yet another country, especially one three times larger than Iraq. An attack would have to be conducted from the air, and it would not result in regime change, which is the only long-term means of stopping the WMD programme. It is hard to have much confidence that US intelligence on Iranian facilities is any better than it was in the case of Iraq. An air campaign is much more likely to build support for the regime than to topple it, and will stimulate terrorism and attacks on American facilities and friends around the globe. The US would be even more isolated in such a war than during the Iraqi campaign, with only Israel as a certain ally.

None of these considerations, nor the debacle in Iraq, has prevented certain neoconservatives from advocating military action against Iran. Some insist that Iran poses an even greater threat than Iraq, avoiding the fact that their zealous advocacy of the Iraq invasion is what has destroyed America's credibility and undercut its ability to take strong measures against Iran.

All of this could well be correct. Ahmadinejad may be the new Hitler; the current negotiations could be our Munich accords; Iran could be in the grip of undeterrable religious fanatics; and the west might be facing a "civilisational" danger. I believe that there are reasons for being less alarmist. Iran is, after all, a state, with equities to defend - it should be deterrable by other states possessing nuclear weapons; it is a regional and not a global power; it has in the past announced extreme ideological goals but has seldom acted on them when important national interests were at stake; and its decision-making process appears neither unified nor under the control of the most radical forces.

What I find remarkable about the neoconservative line of argument on Iran, however, is how little changed it is in its basic assumptions and tonalities from that taken on Iraq in 2002, despite the momentous events of the past five years and the manifest failure of policies that neoconservatives themselves advocated. What may change is the American public's willingness to listen to them.

*Francis Fukuyama is Bernard L. Schwartz Professor of International Political Economy at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) of Johns Hopkins University, and the director of SAIS' International Development program.



To: Threshold who wrote (74163)2/8/2007 10:04:56 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
ZERO DEGREES OF DOLLAR SEPARATION

financialsense.com

by Jim Willie CB

February 8, 2007

*Jim Willie CB is the editor of the “HAT TRICK LETTER”

The last several months have provided a keen lesson in currency defense by a nation which has been written off in many circles as owning a dead and hopeless currency. Some key inter-related feedback loops have been on my radar, each vitally important and changing, which underscore in my viewpoint how major markets are inseparable, each inter-connected, and integrally important if the USDollar is to avoid a much deserved crash. A quip of mine at a conference one year ago centered on my claim that the USDollar was backed by the full force of the US Military. While true in some respect, the actual defense day to day entails a green triangle not to be confused by the iron triangle which fortifies the Pentagon funding, namely the US Congress, the defense contractors, and the lobbyists when grease the funding wheels. Complementing this death grip which has contributed over decades to do irreparable harm to the USDollar, the green triangle consists of holding down gold in a straight jacket, and holding down crude oil in a giant clamp. Never stated is its purpose to reinforce the USDollar from its implied inverse leverage device as hedge funds run for cover. The greenback and gold shine in opposite directions. The greenback and crude oil flow in opposite directions. Goldman Sachs has been at the controls on most of the master machinery.

From 2001 to 2006 much attention has been given to the gold cartel, as they conduct ambushes overnight, pull the rug out from the gold bid at 10 o’clock every morning, dump bullion on the market periodically, promise further central bank gold sales, corrupt their new exchange traded funds as a new hobby, and more sinister games. The sheer size of the outstanding short positions, never with any hope or intention of covering, testifies to the absence of a free market and the institution of a corrupt mangling of the regulatory oversight function. The purpose is to prevent gold from rising in price in any sustained uncontrollable fashion. Treasury Secy Paulson is on record as stating that their objective is to keep a lid on the gold price, which stands as the publicly readable meter on all matters pertaining to inflation and its expectations. The other motive is to screw up the entire perception of inflation and its conceptual understanding, a project which fully deserves the claim “Mission Accomplished” to the masses. An entire generation of indoctrinated economists fills the ranks of colleges and universities.

When the gold price falls, the public perception concerning price inflation relaxes. Better stated, their perception of monetary inflation as an alarm is toned down, thus fostering milder price inflation expectations. With lower inflation built-in gauges at work, comes less erosion to asset prices such as bonds, which are vital to most stock and currency markets. The end result from a subdued gold price is less diversification to other competing currencys such as the euro, and at the same time more USDollar support. Market reality dictates that shortages will persist since a coerced lower price will ensure inadequate supply.

The other side of the Strong Dollar policy has been the other oil cartel, also known as the current Administration of the USGovt. While gold is, or perhaps was, more within the direct control of central bankers via bullion dumping, crude oil has been more within the domain of hedge funds and other mainstream trading houses like big banks and brokerage houses. The funds have managed to bid up the oil price whenever the USDollar sagged in weakness. The Paulson team has gone where no minister has tread or traded before. The Energy Decline Initiative witnessed and engineered last autumn, for the benefit of the ruling party (oops, did not succeed) and economic participants (oil consumers) was something to behold. By cutting by 6% their Goldman Sachs Commodity Index weight for unleaded gasoline, they forced $6 billion in gasoline contract sales, enough to trigger a months long bear in the energy complex. Now that is impressive leverage! This newfound energy trend was sufficient to support the USDollar for another few months. The last year might convince a shrewd iconoclast and suspicious person that the USGovt has been run by a syndicate of sorts for many years. That is certainly my position. The business units of the shadowy group are for the intrepid investigator to discover, not the lazy reader or viewer who relaxes for further infusions doled out by the compromised rags and networks.

When the crude oil price falls, the public perception concerning systemic cost relaxes. Better stated, their perception of the entire cost structure as an alarm is toned down, thus fostering more optimistic growth expectations. With lower cost built-in gauges at work, comes more promising prospects to corporate profits and household spending patterns. The end result from a subdued crude oil price is less speculation in other competing asset groups, and at the same time more USDollar support. The gold price managed to shake off the coordinated siege on the energy complex, primarily delivered as salvos against crude oil. Market reality dictates that shortages will persist since a coerced lower price will ensure inadequate supply.

DEFENSIVE COUNTER-ATTACKS

The trouble with success is that it succeeds too well sometimes. The Paulson team must next relinquish the reins to the oil cartel in power in the executive branch and its friends wielding influence. The State of the Disunion message demonstrated with loud punctuation that the oil interests have seen enough decline in price, that they wish for at least a tepid rise, so as to restore their wealth and private interests. The doubling of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is just the start. To me, that confirmed my stated forecast last month that 50 was the low in the oil price. One can be quite sure that Goldman Sachs covered their energy shorts before the Union message, even probably took large long positions which might have the short-term 60 price target for profit taking.

Immunity from insider trading on a grand national scale is their privilege, reward, benefit, whatever, in true allegiance to the Mussolini Business Model with merged large corporations to the burgeoning state. Who do we suppose issued the research reports expecting a 40 oil price three or four weeks ago? Surely not Goldman or their minions! Surely not their mouthpieces in the press! A more pressing legal question is just what is to stop top Treasury allies from accepting printed money without any pretense of service or obligation for payment? A constant state of war and alert for terrorism certainly helps add to the confusion and to remove the need for vigilance against fraud. Big business is fighting the good fight. On the one end is Congress and its largesse. On the other end is the executive branch and its largesse. All that remains is the Supreme Court and some final largesse. But I digress on ethical violations, the guaranteed path once gold no longer backs the USDollar.

Together, holding back the gold price and the oil price has worked well in keeping firm support for the crippled USDollar. Help for gold suppression comes from European central banks and the Bank of Japan, the 51-st state by certain claims. Help for oil suppression comes from Saudi Arabia, the 52-nd state behind Japan by certain claims. All the while the US Military exerts its broad influence, holds the financial allies in check, forces them to toe the line, and conducts its own secretive business ventures which pay the bills. When a nation owns the world reserve currency, it has the opportunity (not the right) and the privilege (with attendant duty) to act responsibly. The United States has abused on both grounds in a manner which will go down into the history books, with the result being ushered through a transition from benefactor nation with a kind hand to a dominant bully with a crushing hand.

The USDollar will be defended with gold levers, with oil levers, and with military levers as the American Empire fades anything but quietly. Natural forces oppose all three devices abused as tools. One should not regard it as unpatriotic to notice what occurs, since usage of the brain is an inalienable human right. The gold levers are opposed by Asian central banks, principally China and Russia, the outspoken rebel with nuclear capability, tremendous ambition, and willingness to use energy as a formidable weapon. The oil levers are opposed by Mother Nature, who is never to be denied for long. The latest public natural victim has been the Mexican Cantarell giant oil field in rapid 15% annual decline. The military (called in true Orwellian style “defense”) levers are opposed by those who wish not to be invaded on their own turf, a defense mechanism as old as the caveman. The USDollar depends therefore upon Eastern central bankers not to act too rebelliously, upon market mechanisms disobeying Mother Nature, and upon guerrilla fighters not prevailing. One can comfortably count on lost ground on all three fronts, over time. One should always remain aware that gold, oil, and the military are connected by zero degrees of separation.

CHINA INTERRUPTED

The so-called USEconomic recovery from 2002 to 2006 could not have occurred without the critical assistance of China. An estimated one third of the Chinese US$-based reserves investments are designated in corporate bonds and mortgage agency bonds. Perhaps Beijing leaders recently demanded the amplified monetization of mortgage bonds with printing press newly minted money, swapped in federal basements, conducted under cover of night, whose grease is the greater good??? Regardless, the Chinese support cooperation has turned ugly. The Strategic Dialog of December was an utter failure, press reports notwithstanding. Reform will occur on their ordered pace. Intellectual property will continue to be stolen at their whim. Subsidies of their industry will continue as they see fit. Tariffs on incoming US goods will persist as they justify them. Since July 2005, when they dropped their yuan currency peg to the broken USDollar, trade war was silently declared. Big Asian trade surpluses would no longer be routinely stuffed into US$-based securities. The US housing boom would no longer be subsidized across the Pacific Ocean. The great REFI abuse would be revealed as the carburetor for the US consumer. The US Treasury Bond would have to find another patsy to support it via trade surplus.

Three huge events have occurred in recent years to change the globe. The Iraqi War triggered a Russian and Chinese response in the oil world, where the global energy war escalated. The death of King Fahd and assumption of the throne by King Abdullah triggered a quiet defiance by the Saudis in the petro-dollar world. The removal of the Chinese yuan currency peg triggered a trade war, much like a Chinese water torture. Each event pressures the USDollar from its pinnacle position, and therefore gives gold wings.

Enter the 2006 crude oil price runup. As Asians pulled back on USTBond support, the Persian Gulf nations more than ably stepped up to the table to replace that support, Saudi defiance or not. The Iraqi War might act like a constant motivation force for Arab sheikdoms to continue USDollar support, like a fire next door. Wall Street has only begun to recognize that a lower crude oil price means smaller Persian Gulf and OPEC trade surpluses, which in turn mean less USTBond support. The biggest risk nowadays is for the US Federal Reserve to confuse a rising long-term bond yield and interest rate with newfound economic strength. Instead, it is from reduced petro-dollar recycling, plain and simple. This factor has been cited in the last few Hat Trick Letter reports, as of the last few months in 2006. Wall Street finally caught on, only after it became obvious.

The Chinese cooperative participation has turned to the early makings of a trade war. Just last week the US Trade Rep Susan Schwab filed a grievance to the World Trade Organization, citing many specifics against China. The trade war advances precisely on the course anticipated here, and mentioned in numerous articles. From partner to adversary goes China, which will cause great strain to the global financial system. Gold thrives on the conflict and regular shake-up to the system.

INTERRUPTED LOOP – EXPORTED INFLATION

Another important loop has been interrupted, that being the export of inflation to Asia, and the associated import of deflation from Asia. This has been an exceedingly clever, devious, and grand cheat in the scheme of things. The Asian Meltdown was the first casualty from the devious game entreated by USGovt leaders and accepted by ambitious Asians. Here we stand, with a new Asian financial leader in China, an old Asian industrial leader in Japan, an uneasy alliance between them, and a gargantuan kitty of USTBond toilet paper in the form of IOU’s (never to be honored) to show for their cooperative efforts with the United States. Asia managed to build its factories and industrial base, lift its standard of living, provide millions of new jobs (which the US lost but denies steadily), and finally stimulate domestic demand across the Asian continent. Sure, they face problems and challenges, but their prospects look much brighter for both prosperity and freedom than they do for the United States. The old guard economy is beset by dependence upon consumption and debt still, having forfeited its manufacturing base, a key legitimate income source.

The following feedback loop was presented as a slide to a Canadian conference almost two years ago. It is relevant today, not so much as to describe the present, but to highlight the past system which has been interrupted. Just as when an old piece of multiply connected machinery is phased out, new tentacles must be put in place. Such is the nature of the controlled energy price. The new force to keep prices down in the USEconomy is no longer Asian imports on a grand scale, but falling US housing prices and the destruction of wealth. Debt and asset deflation is a dangerous game played by the US Federal Reserve.

The interruption will force a grand continuation of monetary inflation which has taken the global financial system to dangerous levels of dependence upon loose money. We are told not to use the word “inflation” outside of price structures, but that is its origin, namely monetary growth. The global liquidity game is on in true Weimar fashion. Weimar money growth is here. Isn’t it curious that amidst huge money supply growth, the US housing sector is in decline, and the global energy complex is under siege? Do not confuse stock price advances with prosperity, since those higher Dow Jones averages and S&P500 indexes are mere adjustments for a constantly contaminated, continually corrupted USDollar. The purchase power of one S&P unit has not changed one iota.

The gold price has marched upward and will continue to rise as money is ruined. The crude oil price will again reflect the global war to secure oil deposits. Crucially important inter-related feedback loops have been interrupted. An overly heavy reliance upon holding down the gold price and oil price cannot succeed for long in supporting the USDollar, whose fundamental balance sheet resembles a Third World Nation, and whose national leadership tactics and internal makeup resemble a Banana Republic. There are no degrees of separation when it comes to the USDollar, gold, and oil, which will be vivid in coming months.

© 2007 Jim Willie, CB

*Jim Willie CB is a statistical analyst in marketing research and retail forecasting. He holds a Ph.D. in Statistics. His career has stretched over 24 years. He aspires to thrive in the financial editor world, unencumbered by the limitations of economic credentials. Visit his free website to find articles from topflight authors at goldenjackass.com. For personal questions about subscriptions, contact him at “JimWillieCB@aol.com”