SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Another Investment forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: richardred who wrote (88)3/9/2007 10:23:04 AM
From: richardred  Respond to of 340
 
Unemployment Rate Drops to 4.5 Percent
Friday March 9, 10:00 am ET
By Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer
Unemployment Rate Dips to 4.5 Percent, Even As Job Growth Slows

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The nation's unemployment rate dipped to 4.5 percent in February even as big losses of construction and factory jobs restrained overall payroll growth. Wages grew briskly.

The latest snapshot, released by the Labor Department on Friday, offered a picture of an employment climate that remains in fundamentally good shape despite slower job growth in part due to bad winter weather in parts of the country, economists said.

The slight decline in the politically prominent jobless rate, from 4.6 percent in January, came as hundreds of thousand of people left the work force, a development that economists also believe was related to the bad weather in February that made it difficult to get out and look for jobs.

Employers, meanwhile, added 97,000 new jobs to their payrolls in February, the fewest in two years, as bad winter weather forced construction companies to slash 62,000 jobs, the most since 1991. Factories, feeling the strain of the troubled housing and auto industries, also continued to cut jobs. They eliminated 14,000 positions last month.

On a more encouraging note, job gains in the previous two months turned out to be stronger than previously estimated. Employers added 226,000 new jobs in December, versus the 206,000 last estimated. Payrolls grew by 146,000 in January, up from a previous estimate of 111,000.

The new tally of jobs added to the economy in February was close to economists' forecast for a gain of around 100,000. They had predicted the unemployment rate would hold steady at 4.6 percent.

"While we may not be creating as many jobs as we would like to see, the labor market is still in good shape," said Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economics Advisors. "The job market is still tight enough to drive up workers' wages."

Workers' wages grew quickly last month.

Average hourly earnings rose to $17.16, a 0.4 percent increase from January. That was slightly faster than the 0.3 percent gain economists were expecting. Over the 12 months ending in February, wages grew by 4.1 percent.

Strong wage growth is welcome by workers and supports consumer spending, a key ingredient to the country's economic health. But a rapid pickup -- if sustained and not blunted by other economic forces -- can raise fears about inflation. Spiraling inflation would whittle away any wage gains, hurting workers' wallets, and isn't good for the overall economy, either.

The Federal Reserve, which had steadily boosted interest rates for two years to fend off inflation, has left rates alone since August. The Fed -- which said it will keep a close eye on inflation -- meets later this month to consider interest rate policy. Economists said Friday's employment report didn't change their view that the Fed will probably continue to hold interest rates steady.

In other economic news, the Commerce Department reported that the trade deficit narrowed to $59.1 billion in January as U.S. exports climbed to an all-time high.

The latest batch of economic reports come as President Bush continues to get lukewarm ratings for his economic stewardship. Just 41 percent of the public approves of the president's handling of the economy, compared with 57 percent who disapprove, according to an AP-Ipsos poll.

Democrats, who accuse Bush of not doing enough to close the gap on economic inequality, say a top priority is getting final agreement in Congress on legislation to boost the federal minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour. The wage hasn't budged for nearly 10 years. Democrats also are pushing legislation making it easier for workers to start unions against company wishes.

Although construction companies and factories eliminated jobs last month, other employers, including health care providers, financial firms and retailers boosted hiring.

Analysts expect the unemployment rate, which dropped to a six-year low of 4.6 percent last year, will creep up this year as economic growth slows. Some believe the jobless rate could climb to close to 5 percent by the end of this year. The economy expanded by 3.3 percent last year, the best showing in two years. Growth, however, is expected to ebb to around 2.7 percent for all of 2007.

biz.yahoo.com



To: richardred who wrote (88)3/9/2007 10:24:40 AM
From: richardred  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 340
 
Greenspan Rattles Market With R-Word
Friday March 9, 10:23 am ET
By Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer
Greenspan's Continued Talk of Possible Recession Creates Headaches for Successor

WASHINGTON (AP) -- During the 18 1/2 years Alan Greenspan was chairman of the Federal Reserve, he scrupulously avoided forecasting recessions. Now it seems he can't stop using the R-word, and that has created headaches for his successor, Ben Bernanke.

Greenspan delivered a speech via satellite to an investor group in Hong Kong last week in which he said it was possible that the United States could be in a recession by the end of this year.

Those comments, coming from a man who gained near legendary status for his forecasting acumen as Fed chief, were blamed for contributing to a 416-point plunge in the Dow Jones industrial average on Feb. 27.

Greenspan then gave another speech, this time to investors in Tokyo, in which he sought to modify his earlier remarks by saying that "it is possible we could get a recession toward the end of this year, but I don't think it's probable."

He has also given a couple of media interviews since the market plunge, seeking to elaborate on his recession concerns, including one in which he put the risk of a downturn this year at "one-third."

All of this from a man who spent nearly two decades at the Fed making sure never to raise the possibility of a recession out of concern that such talk, by jolting confidence, could turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Greenspan developed his famously opaque speaking style as a way of avoiding direct answers to tough questions, answers that could have gotten in the way of his desire to project the most optimistic views possible about the economy.

In his first year as chairman, Bernanke has gotten kudos for avoiding Greenspan's habit of obfuscation, but he definitely errs on the side of optimism, lest markets be jolted by too dour an assessment from the Fed chief.

Testifying before Congress on Feb. 28, the day after the market's big fall, Bernanke said that markets had been functioning well and he had not seen anything in recent economic data to alter his view for "moderate growth going forward."

Bernanke earned good marks for his calming words during his first market crisis, but that effort was blunted by Greenspan's remarks, leaving economists to wonder what Greenspan was up to.

"I don't think this was aimed at deliberately undercutting Chairman Bernanke, but Greenspan's comments certainly haven't made Bernanke's job any easier," said David Jones, head of DMJ Advisors and the author of four books on the Greenspan Fed.

Jones said he believed that Greenspan, 81, who has spent a lifetime forecasting the economy, was simply getting back to his first love -- studying the economic data and making predictions.

"This is Greenspan being Greenspan. His favorite pastime is forecasting the economy," Jones said.

Since leaving the Fed, Greenspan has been delivering speeches for money to private groups and working on a book due out in September titled, "Age of Turbulence."

In an interview last week with the Wall Street Journal, Greenspan said in his appearances he had avoided answering "any questions which refer directly to monetary policy, what the Fed is doing or what it should do."

Until last week, Greenspan had been largely successful in keeping his views out of the headlines after a bad experience just days after leaving the Fed in 2006 when he roiled markets with comments he made at a private event for a small number of clients of Lehman Brothers.

Published reports say Greenspan is usually paid $150,000 for his speaking engagements. To keep from being a competing voice to his successor, he has provisions in his speaking contracts that reporters can't be admitted and no recordings of the event can be made.

Those restrictions, while keeping Greenspan's comments more private, also work to the advantage of the investors who are putting up big bucks for the appearances by making the time with Greenspan more exclusive.

Analysts contend that it is naive for Greenspan to believe that his views, especially on such hot-button topics as recessions, won't quickly gain a wider audience.

"Greenspan is entitled to make a living, but even when he thinks his comments are not on the public record, they will be because people will talk," said Lyle Gramley, a former Fed governor who is now with Schwab Washington Research Firm, an economic consulting firm.

Among economic forecasters, Greenspan's views on a possible recession are pretty mainstream. His one-in-three probability is only slightly more pessimistic than the 20 percent to 25 percent chance of a downturn that other forecasters are using.

But other forecasters, who have not been Fed chairman, think Greenspan may have learned from this recent episode and may more carefully chose his words for his next speaking engagement.

"I think Mr. Greenspan miscalculated on the amount of attention he would get," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "I think he will go back under the radar screen for awhile and allow Mr. Bernanke to have more time to establish his own forecasting credentials."

Federal Reserve: federalreserve.gov