SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fahrenheit451 who wrote (28343)1/31/2007 6:22:55 PM
From: queenleah  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
yes, fakefahrenheit, I am constantly amused at those folks who start their posts with a weak insult and then say "I don't want to trade insults", and then continue at that process in practically the same breath. I understand it's been your "mission" to hammer away at what Brinker did for the first 25 years. Good luck with that. How's that going for you? I can't help you out much on that one, but carry on if you think that's more important than what he's done for the last 25 years. One thing I'm quite sure he didn't do was adopt someone else's unique internet ID and pretend to be that first person. HTH.



To: fahrenheit451 who wrote (28343)1/31/2007 7:40:34 PM
From: shres  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42834
 
"His actions on this trade tend to bolster my belief that he may not be the Wall Street professional you people claim he is. When I point things like this out I get personal attack from cultists like yourself, Math and Shres." said the impostor.
-------------------------------------------------

A tin-god worshipping, koolaid swilling cultist? That's funny fake fahre.

I just get a chuckle watching you meander all around the net year after year mumbling the same inane question....does anybody know what Brinker did on Wall Street early last century?

Who really cares? I can't remember the last time I saw ANYBODY claim Brinker was a Wall Street professional as you state.

But he did work on Wall Street for years and even if that was as an elevator operator (remember those?) it would be far more Wall St experience than many of the so-called newsletter writer wannabes that you hang around with.

Why do you constantly blast Brinker's credentials from 40 years ago and yet give a pass to Kirk and Korn who have absolutely NO credentials whatsoever...past or present?

Like Stalkie, you claim you NEVER subscribed to Brinker's newsletter, never took any of his advice and rarely listen to his program.

And yet, just like Stocky you now say that if you have a mission...it is to "expose this tin god".

Kirk is parasitically playing this game to grab a few pitiful crumbs from Brinker's plate but why are you, Stocky, the Hon and a few other malcontents on this crusade?

You all claim you are not subscribers, never took his advice and consequently didn't lose a dime on the ill-fated QQQ trade and yet you want to save the goobers and geezers of the world from Brinker.

Your story rings a bit hollow...are you sure you're not making this stuff up?... as Kirk would say.



To: fahrenheit451 who wrote (28343)2/1/2007 4:14:08 PM
From: Yogizuna  Respond to of 42834
 
A true "Wall Street professional" would have never handled the incredibly bad QQQ (now QQQQ) call the way Brinker did, because along with the honor of being called a "professional", comes the responsibility of taking the bad, along with the good trading vehicle predictions in stride, with absolutely no attempt to hide or separate their prognostications.