Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (215946)	2/2/2007 9:04:21 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The 1998 policy did not involve an invasion. And yes, Bush had something to do with pushing the intelligence agencies to supply convenient evidence for his road to war. Had he come with all the evidence- that which weakened his case as well as the iffy intel that supported it, and had he not pushed his mouthpieces to say they were absolutely certain.... then I would agree with you, it would be pure partisanship for people to backtrack. But the evidence was so manipulated that I can understand what politicians, of left AND right, say now "If I had seen all the data, I wouldn't have supported it". I don't blame the left OR the right for being bamboozled- but I do blame anyone who continues to support a bamboozler. It's easy for me to see the partisanship in what happened in the intel agencies, can you see it too?