Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gersh Avery who wrote (5911)	2/2/2007 12:43:01 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

re teenagers It makes sense to me that there should be a minimum smoking age. If people are going to smoke anyway, don't you think there should be a minimum age established? The people that establish minimum smoking ages now are the criminals. Do you wish to keep it that way? That wasn't very clear. You say it makes sense that there should be a minimum smoking age but then say the people that establish minimum smoking ages now are "criminals". Maybe you could clarify. If weed were legal, should there be an age under which one can't legally smoke weed or not? If so, what would you suggest that age be?