SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jimmg who wrote (71359)2/3/2007 3:47:15 PM
From: ChanceIsRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
>>>There is no possible way that mortgage credit has grown faster than nominal real estate values over the past 4 years.<<<

I would have to look at some numbers, but to be the devil's advocate, consider that every time a "zero down" is issued, the total debt (denominator) increases and the equity (numerator) doesn't change at all. Further consider that for the zero downs, the mortgage is growing at exactly the same pace as real estate values - since after all, the loan is for the total real estate value. Of course, those who put zero down and can hold will start having some owner's equity as soon as prices rise. When you have 0% to begin with, then even a $10K price increase won't increase the equity/debt ratio much.

So this all depends upon how much money was borrowed at what time in the housing cycle. I am far from having a data based answer.

However, it is my understanding that most of the bad loans - no docs, low docs, interest only, options ARM, etc, were made in the last few years.



To: jimmg who wrote (71359)2/3/2007 4:02:38 PM
From: ChanceIsRespond to of 306849
 
>>>Redux: There is no possible way that mortgage credit has grown faster than nominal real estate values over the past 4 years.<<<

I failed to mention the dire consequences to the equity/debt ratio should prices be dropping. Equity decreases while debt remains fairly constant. If 90% of loans in the last four were 100% loans and issued in July '05, then sure as h&*l, that equity/debt ratio would be dropping big time.

Again, it all depends on the loan ratio, what locale, and when in the cycle.

Oh - another point. All of that negative amortization in the option ARMS (see the 17 dead subprime lenders) will have a very depressing effect on the equity/debt ratio. Oh my. Throw in dropping market prices on top of those taking out equity via option ARMs, and ratio drops like a rock.

For the third time, I don't have the numbers, so all of my arguments are very qualitative. However, I would take a stand that the equity/debt drop seen in the chart COULD be real.



To: jimmg who wrote (71359)2/3/2007 5:21:23 PM
From: Elroy JetsonRespond to of 306849
 
The chart of declining homeowners equity is actually taken from the data prepared by the Federal Reserve. You can find the data in the Statistical Abstract of the United States.

Its unfortunate you don't believe data which doesn't agree with your fantasy world, as you would quickly learn much about the real world.
.



To: jimmg who wrote (71359)2/3/2007 6:12:13 PM
From: Les HRespond to of 306849
 
When the graph started, the average new homebuyer had to put down 50 percent and take out a 10-year interest-only balloon loan for the remainder. The data looks even worse if you don't include the people who've paid off their loans.