Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The new NFL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (16243)	2/4/2007 1:48:52 PM
From: Robert F. Newton	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90312

I'm with Oral...............I'd rather lose than win with that POS. Let the SOB rot in Oakland

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (16243)	2/5/2007 10:33:44 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90312

Moss seemed better behaved the last 2 years I guess, but also less productive. Of course it might be hard to be very productive in Oakland's offense. And why he may have been less wild in certain ways then in the past, I don't think he has had a great attitude. When asked about his dropped passes he said "Maybe because I'm unhappy and I'm not too much excited about what's going on, so, my concentration and focus level tend to go down sometimes when I'm in a bad mood." sfgate.com So there is plenty of reason not to want him. OTOH he might get exited about playing with Farve, and the offense should be much better than Oakland's. I could see it possible working as a short term thing, just get rid of him when Farve retires. But if the trade is expensive, or the contract it too long at too high of price, I'd say forget about it.