SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scratchmyback who wrote (59739)2/4/2007 10:16:26 PM
From: masa  Respond to of 197351
 
"Motorola hasn't sold that many entry level phones over there despite being the winner of GSMA's entry level phone trophy for two times"

Winning them has actually been negative for MOT share price. That is, to my mind, the reason they did not participate this time.



To: scratchmyback who wrote (59739)2/4/2007 10:17:31 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197351
 
The winner gets the right to sell phones for a certain price, but the operators are not obliged to buy a single one. They may buy some phones if they need them, but they can as well buy other phones for other price, if that serves them better. And I guess that's what has happened in the emerging market, Motorola hasn't sold that many entry level phones over there despite being the winner of GSMA's entry level phone trophy for two times.

No doubt that a large contract order would be nice, but I have been looking at this award in a bit of a larger context.

1) It would validate Qualcomm as the low-cost leader. Nokia didnt participate because they have that option, but how about Motorola? I think it is fairly clear that Freescale didnt have a chipset that could provide MOT with a handset capable of meeting the cost/specs. Sony Ericsson may have participated and lost. Where is Broadcom, or TI, or any of the other half-dozen merchant chipset vendors?

2) Motorola's ULC handset win with the GSMA didnt create the market but I think it did accelerate the volumes. Yes, Nokia is still doing very well selling ~$70 handsets, but while Motorola isnt making any money, they are selling a huge number of low cost handsets whether they are the GSMA model or not. I see the same effect in 3G.

3G handsets have barely made headway within the European prepay market. We are finally getting to price points that are going to change that fact.

Slacker



To: scratchmyback who wrote (59739)2/5/2007 7:19:33 PM
From: waitwatchwander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197351
 
Isn't it strange that the GSMA undertook the "3G-for-All" contest at this time?

Later this year, we should start seeing single chip solutions which are going to dramtically cut the cost of basic UMTS handsets. Whatever handset wins the contest may well have a short shelf life.