Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (31905)	2/5/2007 1:11:40 AM
From: hank2010	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78422

Marcos: Is CRO's Kenbridge property on an island in the lake that is the source of water supply for the city of Winnipeg? I may be mixing things up, but I stayed away from it for that reason.

To: marcos who wrote (31905)	2/5/2007 8:49:01 AM
From: Mr. Aloha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78422

CUU is much more advanced. They proved up the enormous Schaft Creek mineralization and did a preliminary assessment (scoping study) over 2 years ago, and could complete their prefeasibility study this quarter. In addition, any dilution they do to advance their project will likely be paid back 4x when Teck exercises their back-in option. It's a much different situation than earlier stage projects. However, because they will need a good amount more dilution before proving feasibility, that and Teck's back-in option need to be factored in when comparing it to more advanced projects. Even after factoring those in, CUU's an incredible value, IMO.