Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (17339)	2/5/2007 5:17:00 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

That's right. And if we had things your way tobacco companies would still be advertising to the public (recall Camel marketing smokes to children) that cigarette smoking is a healthy past time. They'd still be paying scientist to debunk "government" science that said smoking was addictive and cancer causing. And they'd be doing so knowing full well that the gov't science was correct. So you are right, government sponsored science is bad, and Exxon Mobil is good. The scientists Exxon Mobil pays are the ones that say there is no truth to global warming. Stick with Exxon, Peter, you can trust em. The world's climate ain't changing because of carbon emissions, that's right.