Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (34352)	2/6/2007 2:52:26 PM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541957

If I ever saw a candidate who really impressed me enough to sign on, I would think about it. But I have zero experience with domestic election politics, and little interest in ever being involved. The candidate in question would have to be someone truly exceptional; I wouldn't get into it just for the sake of the game. Been there and done that overseas and know how the movie ends.

To: JohnM who wrote (34352)	2/6/2007 7:39:09 PM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541957

are you auditioning to be a PR person for some likely Dem senate candidate in 08 Who me? From the NY Times Editorial The Other Defense Budget Published: February 6, 2007 American troops under fire in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve every penny requested for them in President Bush’s new $622 billion Pentagon budget. And the overstretched Army and Marine Corps clearly need support, along with the extra troops that will eventually come their way. But that still leaves more than half of the overall request for Congress to carefully scrutinize and significantly prune. Apart from war costs and personnel increases, this budget slips in more than $40 billion in other spending increases, compared with last year. Since Mr. Bush took office, the Pentagon budget has more than doubled. It is now higher, in real terms, than it has been in the past half-century. Congress should direct particular attention to the roughly $140 billion in weapons procurement, research and development costs that are not part of the Iraq and Afghanistan section of the budget. Far too many of these programs are products of cold war strategic thinking and have outlived their rationale in a world with no superpower arms race. That includes the $4.6 billion slated for the Air Force’s F-22 stealth fighter, the $2.6 billion for the Marine Corps’ tilt-wing V-22 Osprey, the $3 billion for the Navy’s DDG-1000 stealth destroyer and $2.5 billion for the Virginia-class attack submarine. It also includes much of the $15.9 billion going to space weapons and missile defense. Several of these programs can be canceled outright. The F-22 is one of three new-generation stealth fighters, and the most expendable because it was originally designed for air-to-air combat against Soviet-style MIG fighters. Likewise, the Virginia-class submarine was designed to track enemy nuclear submarines. The DDG-1000 is a blue-water fighting fortress, when what the Navy really needs these days is smaller, faster ships that can operate in shallow coastal waters. It makes sense to provide the Navy and Air Force with adequate means to maintain their current comfortable margins of superiority over any probable foe. That can still be done for billions of dollars less than President Bush has just requested. If the new Democratic-controlled Congress is serious about reducing budget deficits and finding the money to pay for acute domestic needs, it will have to pare back the most extravagant elements of this fantasy weapons wish list. Special responsibility falls on the Armed Services Committee chairmen in both houses, Senator Carl Levin and Representative Ike Skelton. Addiction to military pork is the one area in which bipartisanship has flourished in Washington in the past six years. This nation can afford to pay for all of its legitimate military needs. What it cannot afford are costly jobs programs disguised as defense and the wasteful weapons projects promoted by an army of well-connected Washington lobbyists.