Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (216621)	2/6/2007 8:23:25 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

How about the Vietnamese invasion of Khmer Rouge ruled Cambodia? The Indian invasion of east Pakistan? The NATO intervention in Yugoslavia? Those three all happpened to end ongoing genocides, but were certainly "illegal". As for Tibet, while you say it is illegal, we all know absolutely nothing will ever be done about it. Int'l law forbidding any military action not sanctioned by the "int'l community" is something that wwould only bind the most conscientious of nations while setting free the most wicked. The US has been right to reject giving up any sovereignity to "int'l courts".