Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (6224)	2/6/2007 9:17:38 PM
From: pcstel	Respond to of 8420

What, may I ask, does THAT have to do with it? Well, If you are concerned about Cash Burn.. You would be very concerned about it. I mean.. After all.. The company made a note of this fact in the SEC statements and press releases. So obviously they believed it was a material note. Just because you don't like the data, and or it doesn't agree with you agenda.. Doesn't mean it is not factual. Here is what the press release stated: "SIRIUS reported a net loss of ($458.5) million, or ($0.33) per share, for the first quarter of 2006, including a ($0.20) per share impact from equity charges, compared to a net loss of ($193.6) million, or ($0.15) per share, in the year-ago quarter, including a ($0.03) per share impact from equity charges. The adjusted net loss per share, or net loss per share excluding equity charges, was ($0.13) in the first quarter 2006 as compared to an adjusted net loss per share of ($0.12) in the first quarter of 2005. (Refer to the reconciliation table of GAAP net loss per share to the adjusted net loss per share)." Imagine that.. All of that equity they issued instead of using CASH.. And SIRI's market cap is still 1.2 Billion higher than XM's. LOL! That must really tie up your stomach in knots. You don't measure income by CASH. ROTFLMAO!! Well, gee.. Uhh! Great!! I think everyone here understands that concept, and I am not sure why you are bringing that up right now, and attempting to change the subject???? Now you can go back and read my last statement for yourself.. I said nothing about how income is measured. You are attempting to claim that I stated that imcome was measured by cash.. I said no such thing, and didn't even bring up the subject of income in the last series of posts. Any other items you want to just blurt our about.. Maybe something about Horseshoes, or Ducks feet, or something else way off topic? That $200M (plus the other $80M they claim they are expensing for Stern) are operating expenses of the business. Where did I say that it wasn't? I simply stated the facts of the situiation. You don't like them, and now have spun off on some wild A$$ tangent about stuff that wasn't even discussed to attempt to discredit the facts. Clueless, truly clueless. No you reach even further and make a attempt to draw a conclusion about a series of statements THAT I NEVER MADE. LOL!! Why are you SOOOO BITTER Mr. Ray?? Any other way off topic statements that you would like to make, and then claim I am clueless, truly clueless about those very topics that you spun off onto, yet I have not even commented on? So, maybe it will be 1.1 Billion instead. BFD. Oh!! So your 1.2 Billion statement was not a FACT as you claimed it was? So you now admit that you were "just making stuff up because it sounds good, and claiming it is a FACT".. Just like you have been busted on so many times in the past that it's hard to keep track of.. LOL!! And for some reason.. You don't understand why no one gives you or your "OPINIONS" a grain of respect? Go figure And so it goes, PCSTEL