Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (216694)	2/6/2007 9:30:51 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You didn't express an opinion about three other clearly "illegal" invasions I listed - of Cambodia by VN, East Pakistan by India, and Yugoslavia by NATO. Do you think there is some benefit from labeling these "illegal"? Would any right-thinking person really want VN to be condemned for overthrowing the KR's genocide? Or India for ending Pakistan's genocide in the former East Pakistan? Or NATO for ending the ethnic cleansing wars in the Balkans? Would we want a world court to have forced these illegal invasions to be reversed? Of course not. Int'l law which would protect the most brutal oppressors and warmongers and which would only bind the most beneficial of powers is worse than no law.