Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (87311)	2/7/2007 12:24:34 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 173976

It's a guy who looks out the window and tells you what the weather is like.

To: Bill who wrote (87311)	2/7/2007 1:39:30 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

Peer-reviewed means you're willing to let another scientist review your data. If you're unwilling to do that you're either a fraud, wrong on your data or an extra-terrestial genius. Since we know Exxon is offering $10,000 to any scientist willing to deny global warming, it's a fair bet that the the jig is up. The only scientists willing to deny it are ones who've been paid off. It's really disgusting. Plus we've seen clear evidence of an Exxon operative in the EPA red-lining the climate reports to get rid of all evidence showing global warming is not only real and a crisis, but man-made. I defy anyone anywhere to point to any credible scientist who denies global warming is both real and at least mostly man-made. And by credible I mean willing to prove it. The debate now becomes clear. We know global warming is a crisis and is man-made. But what can we do to slow it down or even stop it? That is where the USA neds to lead, not follow, but first that's going to take some slapping down of Exxon lobbyists in DC, and to oust Bush-Cheney who have been big oil and pollution pimps for decades.