Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (216800)	2/7/2007 5:08:09 PM
From: Katelew	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

You appear to still be loyal to Bush and the Republican party. I would be curious to know why? What's happened in the last six years that has improved your life or the state of the union? Or is it just a visceral distrust of the democratic party? (Nothing wrong with those kinds of sentiments, imo) Anyway, I can't get an answer from Brumar and mjdfl, so thought I'd ask you.....

To: Ilaine who wrote (216800)	2/7/2007 7:12:55 PM
From: geode00	Respond to of 281500

He attacked the integrity of the men he served with, just to get ahead. Baloney. Kerry attacked the running of the Vietnam War AND those individuals who committed atrocities. Your support of atrocities during war time is quite astonishing. So you must think that Abu Ghraib should have been excused as simply war time hijinks? What about the beating murder of a prisoner? What about the rape and murder of the Iraqi girl and her family? I suppose you think those should be ignored as simply products of any war. Your lack of morality is astonishing but that's what makes you a rightwinger. As it turns out, those 'men' none of whom actually SERVED with Kerry, have shown themselves for the jealous, craven, nothings they are. Kerry has built quite a life for himself while they have not. Such jealousy and envy must grate on their nerves every time they see him on the TV LOL.