Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (216819)	2/8/2007 2:00:47 AM
From: Garden Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I don't consider it acceptable to blow up innocent human beings. However, there is a reason why people resort to such drastic actions. As you can see, Palestine has no weapons or armaments to defend itself from Israeli occupation. With the overkill by the Israelis there is blowback and you get the suicide bombers. Now if you noticed in Lebanon last summer, when Israel was met with weapons and armament from Hezbollah, the Israelis kinda wimped out -not like all the shock and awe it does in Palestine. Therefore, let's hope that the Iranians don't supply the Palestininas with armaments just like the US supplies to Israel, because they would legitimately have a right to use it against Israel's occupation. And it's a lot easier to be brave when your opponent throws rocks or an occasional suicide bomber shows up - it would be far more catastrophic for the Israelis if they were confronted with rifles, tanks, and anti-aircraft weapons. Remember the Golden Rule, if we are supplying one side with weapons of mass destruction to an occupying power, why can't another country supply those occupied to defend their territory? It's a two way street my friend.