SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Garden Rose who wrote (216883)2/8/2007 2:40:58 AM
From: mistermj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
In fact the US was upholding the UN Charter. Making it relevant.

The wording of UNSC 1441 was IMMEDIATE compliance or SEVERE consequences.

The compliance wasn't immediate by Hans Blix own words.

Kofi was dysfunctional and no longer had credibility ...he was too worried about his Oil for Food bribes from Iraq...and his sons involvement.



To: Garden Rose who wrote (216883)2/8/2007 2:56:07 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The UN Charter was violated, that's what Kofi Annan indicated.

Didn't the UN resolution say Saddam must verifiably disarm or face the consequences? If you're going to claim a law was broken you should be ready to prove Saddam verifiable disarmed (UN inspectors concluded they couldn't verify his disarmament).


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News