SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gasification Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis Roth who wrote (737)11/9/2007 8:53:48 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 1740
 
Commercial Cellulosic Ethanol Plant Groundbreaking
Published Thu, 2007-11-08 12:25 Energy
technologynewsdaily.com

Range Fuels, Inc. broke ground on November 6th on one of the nation's first commercial cellulosic ethanol plants. Range Fuels is one of six companies selected by DOE for financial support in building commercial cellulosic ethanol plants and is the first to break ground. The plant will be located near the town of Soperton, Georgia, and will draw on gasification technology to convert wood and wood waste from Georgia's pine forests and mills into 20 million gallons of ethanol per year. Construction of the first phase is expected to be completed next year. DOE will provide $50 million in support of the first phase of construction and will provide another $26 million for the first expansion phase, which will increase its capacity to 30 million gallons of ethanol per year. The company plans to eventually expand the plant to an annual capacity of 100 million gallons of ethanol per year.

The Soperton plant will be fueled with wood and wood waste to minimize its reliance on fossil fuels. And in a state that's currently racked with drought, the Soperton plant will consume only one-quarter of the water consumed by today's corn ethanol plants. Range Fuels estimates that Georgia could produce enough cellulosic biomass to support up to two billion gallons of ethanol production using the company's technology.

Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman attended the groundbreaking ceremony and noted its importance for advancing cost-competitive ethanol produced from non-food biomass sources, an approach crucial for reducing the nation's dependence on petroleum. Over the next four years, DOE intends to invest up to $385 million in six commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol refineries, including the Range Fuels plant as well as facilities to be located in California, Florida, Idaho, Iowa, and Kansas. The six biorefineries will have a combined production capacity exceeding 130 million gallons.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (737)11/15/2007 6:02:45 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1740
 
Breaking Ground on Cellulosic Ethanol

Commercial-scale plants are being built, but the fuel could still be too expensive to compete with corn ethanol.

By Kevin Bullis
Thursday, November 15, 2007
technologyreview.com

Range Fuels, a startup based in Broomfield, CO, has broken ground on what could be the first plant to make commercial-scale quantities of ethanol from cellulosic biomass. But the news isn't necessarily a signal that ethanol from wood chips and grass is ready to compete with ethanol from corn grain. Commercially viable cellulosic ethanol may still be many years away.

The Range Fuels plant, to be located in southeast Georgia, could be producing ethanol as soon as next year. It's being funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) as part of the agency's effort to increase the use of biofuels. The DOE is providing a total of $76 million to the company for the construction of its new plant. At first, it will produce 20 million gallons, eventually increasing that amount to 100 million.

Almost all of the more than five billion gallons of ethanol produced in the United States has been made from cornstarch. But ethanol from cellulosic sources is an attractive alternative because it could potentially require less fossil-fuel energy to produce, and its supplies of biomass are vast. Indeed, if biofuels are ever to displace more than about 10 percent of gasoline in the United States, cellulosic ethanol will be essential. But making ethanol from cellulosic biomass is much more difficult than making it from cornstarch. And the process for converting biomass into biofuels has not been economically viable.

However, Range Fuels CEO Mitch Mandich says that the company can produce ethanol at prices competitive with corn-based ethanol--even factoring in the high capital costs associated with building a cellulosic-biofuel plant. Range Fuels has developed a two-step thermochemical process for converting wood chips and other types of biomass into a combination of alcohols that include ethanol, methanol, propanol, and butanol. In the first step, called gasification, heat, pressure, and steam convert biomass into a mixture of primarily hydrogen and carbon monoxide. This gas mixture, called syngas, is then exposed to catalysts that convert it into alcohols. The process is similar to the Fischer-Tropsch process that has been used for decades to convert coal into liquid fuels.

Mandich says that a combination of a new, proprietary catalyst and improvements in the design and engineering of the plant can make the process economical. Also, the company is locating the plant close to supplies of wood chips, minimizing the transportation costs associated with bulky biomass. In addition, the company plans to blend the ethanol with gasoline and sell it locally to drivers, reducing the costs of shipping the biofuel.

But since the company is depending heavily on funding from the federal government to build the first plant, it is difficult to gauge whether its process is actually commercially viable. Earlier this year, the DOE announced funding for six cellulosic-ethanol plants. The first installment of Range Fuels' award will be $50 million to build a 20-million-gallon-a-year plant. Mandich declines to give estimates on the total cost of the plant. But the typical cost of corn-ethanol plants is about $2 per gallon of capacity, or $40 million for a 20-million-gallon plant. Even if the cost of Range Fuels' plant is twice as much as that of a conventional plant, or $80 million, the DOE is providing the lion's share of the investment--money that Mandich says is "very important" to the success of Range Fuels. Such a heavy dependence on government financing, rather than on private investors, could suggest that commercially viable cellulosic ethanol remains a good way off.

What's more, there are many unknowns about how well the thermochemical process will work when it comes to making commercial-scale quantities. Past attempts by scientists at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to scale up thermochemical techniques showed that smaller systems that work well face problems when processing chambers are bigger. Also, plants operating at high temperatures and pressures tend to deteriorate quickly, adding to costs. The latter concern might be less of a problem now, however, says Steve Deutch, a senior research scientist at NREL, because of the more-resilient materials.

Thermochemical approaches to making biofuels, such as Range Fuels' approach, also face competition from new biological methods that use enzymes and organisms to break down cellulose and produce ethanol. Indeed, in September, Mascoma, based in Cambridge, MA, announced that it would build a cellulosic plant in Monroe County, TN, that will make ethanol from switchgrass. At this point, it's still not clear which approach will work best, because no commercial-scale plant of either type is operating. During the DOE's funding earlier this year, the agency backed both thermochemical and biological approaches.

Ultimately, it's still too soon to predict how successful early attempts like Range Fuels' will be. "It's hard to make money on the first one of anything," says Lanny Schmidt, a professor of chemical engineering and materials science at the University of Minnesota, who is also developing thermochemical methods for making biofuel. However, if the first plant works as well as Mandich hopes, the production of cellulosic fuel could quickly accelerate.

"Who knows how the economics will work out?" Schmidt says. "You have to build it and see what happens. It's a wise move on DOE's part to try different technologies, because no one knows at this point who's going to be the winner."



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (737)6/12/2008 6:09:33 AM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 1740
 
Alabama plant to begin producing ethanol from waste wood
Alabama plant will use special process to turn useless sawdust and scrap timber into ethanol
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
al.com

THOMAS SPENCER
News staff writer

LIVINGSTON - In a cavernous, abandoned lumber mill in the Black Belt, a small team of engineers and technicians is assembling a demonstration plant that, as early as this month, will start turning wood scraps into ethanol.

The plant would be one of the first in the country to use a technology called gasification on wood waste. Most ethanol and biodiesel plants use fermentation to turn soybeans or corn into fuel.

If the plant runs as advertised, the company - Gulf Coast Energy - plans to expand on the site with a $90 million commercial-scale plant, which it says will be capable of producing 45 million gallons of ethanol a year.

To put that in perspective, in Alabama we use about 2.5 billion gallons of gasoline per year, according to Steve Taylor, the director for the Center for Bioenergy and Bioproducts at Auburn University.

The plant will use a process called gasification to produce fuels from local sources of waste sawdust and scrap timber, materials that otherwise would be burned, landfilled or left to rot.

Gulf Coast Energy, a startup company whose board chairman is Livingston lawyer Drayton Pruitt, is one of a handful of companies around the country exploring the use of gasification on nonfood plants.

With petroleum prices soaring, the demand for alternatives is growing. Corn-based ethanol is the most established biofuel, but some have begun to question whether it's the best option. Corn grown for ethanol competes for land that could be used to grow food.

Raising corn also involves the use of petroleum-based fertilizers and gasoline-powered machinery. And the process for converting corn to fuel, a form of fermentation, isn't as efficient as it is for other crops and using other technologies.

Gulf Coast Energy is not alone in exploring the use of gasification on wood waste. Another company, Range Fuels, which is backed by Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, has begun construction on a commercial-scale plant in Soperton, Ga. The gasification process is not new, either, but has primarily been used on coal.

Germans gasified coal:

The Germans gasified coal to fuel their armies after the Allies cut off petroleum supplies during World War II. Facing an oil embargo during the apartheid era, the South Africans used coal gasification to produce gasoline.

The plant material - which can be wood waste, switchgrass or any carbon-based material - is ground very fine, then fed into a dryer. The dried material is subjected to high heat, which breaks apart the hydrogen, carbon and oxygen molecules and forms a synthetic gas. That gas is then subjected to a chemical reaction called the Fischer-Tropsch process, which reassembles the molecules into fuels such as ethanol, butanol, methanol and propanol.

Pruitt said Gulf Energy's process was designed by a Mississippi inventor and the demonstration plant was disassembled and moved from Aberdeen, Miss. He said the company won't disclose the identity of the technology's developer, saying only that he worked in the chemical industry and developed the technology using his own money and grants. But he is confident it will work on the larger scale.

"It has the highest yield of any of the technologies we looked at," Pruitt said.

The process uses a closed-loop system that doesn't emit carbon dioxide. After the initial reactions are started, the plant can power itself, recycling heat and using the fuel produced.

"It is an extremely efficient process and an extremely clean process," Pruitt said.

Figuring out what to do with waste products has long been an interest of Pruitt's. He was one of the originators of the hazardous waste landfill at Emelle, also in Sumter County and now operated by Chem Waste.

On this venture he is working with engineers Mark Warner and Scott Hazen, who previously worked at the Mercedes plant in Vance. Pruitt says he has put together enough venture capital to start construction of the commercial-scale plant almost as soon as the demonstration plant is up and running. If construction begins in July, the company expects to complete the project in 14 months.

David Bransby, an Auburn University professor whose research focuses on plants like switchgrass that can be used as fuel, said he didn't know anything about the particular technology Gulf Energy is using, but said "the general technology is one of the better-looking technologies."

A ton of biomass should have the equivalent energy content of 2.5 barrels of oil, Bransby said. With oil trading in excess of $120 a barrel, a ton of biomass, if you were able to efficiently extract the energy from it, should be worth $250. But according to Bransby, right now you can get wood at less than $50 a ton. That creates a financial incentive to achieve an efficient method of converting biomass energy into fuel.

"I believe you are going to see some remarkable progress in the next few years," he said.

Auburn's Steve Taylor said that even if the conversion of wood to fuel was perfected, it shouldn't lead to an environmentally destructive race to cut down Alabama forests.

According to Taylor, there are 4 million tons of logging debris, limbs and tops left on the ground under current timber practices that either rots or is burned. In addition, there are trees that are too small to be marketable, even as pulpwood. Auburn estimates that Alabama could provide almost 15 million tons of wood waste annually without increasing logging.

The problem is finding new ways to efficiently get that material to a processing site. "It is not cost-effective to package it and bundle it up," Taylor said.

Researchers are looking at ways to create portable gasification plants that would be able to convert the wood waste to fuel on the site.

Regardless, it would be a long time before demand for wood waste caught up to supply.

Mark Warner, Gulf Coast's CEO, said he imagines a future in which small-scale biofuel plants make use of locally available sources to make fuel and supply a community in a 50-mile radius.

In his opinion, such a model is not as far away as some think. "We are farther along than the general public realizes," Warner said.

Scott Z. Hazen, Gulf Coast's executive vice president for construction and engineering, said a realistic goal is that biofuels could provide 25 percent of the country's energy by 2025.

E-mail: tspencer@bhamnews.com