SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (63518)2/8/2007 11:26:42 AM
From: maceng2  Respond to of 116555
 
Wait at least 6 months before buying new anything. I usually wait a couple of years.



To: mishedlo who wrote (63518)2/8/2007 11:41:30 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
mish I am a user of Vista Beta and then Vista RC1 - what plunger notes is correct.

I have a portable that I cannot bring back to life some folders even that I re-installed XP and removed Vista - they are still blocked. The design was done with very little strategic thinking.

The main issue is that they allocated two "programs" folders on for 32 bit and one for 64 this by itself makes a huge mess with lots of things and software which likes to install itself in the "programs" file and is 32 bit

Until the world does not convert to 64 bit upgrading to Vista is useless as all 32 bit programs rum slower than on a XP even after installing them correctly - the problems lies in the conversion layer from 32 bit to 64 bit and back.

Oh and almost forgot you need at least 1 Gig as Vista eats up over 700 Meg of memory, so best would be 1.5 Gig at a time that XP was fine with 500 Meg

So consumers are screwed as the best would be to reinstall XP and pay more money



To: mishedlo who wrote (63518)2/8/2007 11:58:48 AM
From: westpacific  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116555
 
Credit on top of Debt on top of Credit on Top of Debt on top of Credit on top of Debt.

That is not the question, the question is more like how high they can build this ponzi pyramid. Remember the whole world is in on this game now.

Subprime news showing a few cracks..........

Adding a little more to my short funds hedge.

West



To: mishedlo who wrote (63518)2/8/2007 1:44:21 PM
From: LTK007  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 116555
 
Mish i have just watched an interview with a fellow i highly respect, his name Richard Hoey of Mellon and Dreyfus(via Blomberg TV).
You would like to catch this interview if you can, i do believe.
Bottomline he is projecting a prolonged recession in the housing market.
i find his reasoning for this to be SOLID analysis. Max



To: mishedlo who wrote (63518)2/8/2007 6:52:53 PM
From: regli  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
"...
1. Vista is incompatible with my mobile PCI datacard, so I'm no longer mobile. I can't beliee this is the only instance where MS have made incompatible changes. They certainly know how to be hated.

2. I have had huge problems installing some software. Although I gave myself Administrator priveleges, Vista didn't quite give me verything, ie not "special priveleges". So, although I was the only user I wasn't allowed to make certain registry changes, and had to set up another user, super-administrator, non-password protected ... which rather defeats the object of user passwords. Unnecessarily complex for a one-user home system IMO. MS certainly know how to be loathed."


As to number 1. This has nothing to do with Vista but with the fact that PC Card slots are being replaced by ExpressCard slots. These new slots are much faster than the older PC card slots but also incompatible. Hardware technology does move on and MS should not and cannot be blamed for this.

kb.iu.edu

Now to 2.

one of the biggest security issues with Windows has been that most users are signing in with administrator privileges. This allows badly behaved programs to take advantage and install spyware, viruses, etc.

Here are some links that explain why this is an absolutely necessary approach in today's world. Note that other operating system like Linux have similar approaches to system administration.

technet.microsoft.com
"... User Account Control leverages the Windows security user model to distinguish between administrator and standard users. The standard user account is an account that has no computer administrator privilege. When a user whose account is a member of the local Administrator account logs on to a Windows Vista computer, they are logged on as a standard user by default. When the user wants to perform a task that requires administrative privileges, such as installing an application, Windows Vista explicitly prompts the user for permission or for credentials, depending on the security policy that is chosen. This process helps ensure that malware cannot silently install on a user’s computer. Unlike Windows XP, however, standard users are not automatically blocked from performing tasks that require administrative privileges. Windows Vista explicitly prompts a standard user to enter valid credentials for a local administrator account before it will allow the standard user to perform the task. ..."

And here:

72.14.253.104
"...System services are background processes that are always running to support key functionality. They have been a major target for malicious software attacks because they typically run with the highest possible system privileges (referred to as LocalSystem). A malicious attack that exploits system services could cause problems by running arbitrary code with administrator privileges on the user’s machine. (The Slammer, Blaster and Sasser worms all targeted system services.)

To mitigate this threat, Windows Vista introduces the concept of “restricted services” that run under the least possible privileges and limit their activities to the local machine or network. A restricted service program runs from the start with minimal privileges and capabilities. The restricted service approach significantly reduces the number of services that are capable of doing unlimited damage to a user’s machine. ..."



To: mishedlo who wrote (63518)2/8/2007 7:00:00 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
Counterfeiting Money - Crime or Good Economics?
globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Mish