SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pompsander who wrote (758953)2/8/2007 6:52:02 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
I've heard similar-style rumblings from among certain Republican power centers.

For example, that they could (reluctantly) get behind a maverick like McCain --- strictly to keep the Hillary-Boogie out of the WH (&... only because McCain would be 'just a placeholder' 'too old' to run again in 2012... so the game would be all about his V.P, choice.)

Or that the liberal Guilianni could be 'acceptable' to the base (I think they are fooling themselves on this one :-), insofar as he is the 'surest' Clinton beater (& if he mouths some pablum about 'conservative Court nominees', and maybe gives a talk at Bob Jones....)

Or even THIS making the rounds (Hastert was quoted saying this the other day): *losing* in 2008 is NECESSARY to allow the GOP to wash out all the big-spending, fauxconservative types, then re-load, back true to it's imagined 'small government roots', and sweep to national victory in 2012.

Signs of panicky behavior and malaise....

I thought (what we discussed earlier yesterday) that it was VERY INSTRUCTIVE how *Jebbie* was introduced a week or so ago in (Iowa, I believe it was) for a speech to Party faithful: "The man who would be the NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES... if his last name were only 'Smith'."

Instructive how Bush II has laid them so low, and his policies are on the verge of delivering to the Party a nation-wide defeat of possibly epic proportions in 2008 (unless Party elders can separate themselves from his handiwork in time...), and how the very name of Bush has been so devalued in the political arena after the father and the son....

Momentous is the only word that comes to mind to describe the political developments.



To: pompsander who wrote (758953)2/8/2007 6:57:55 PM
From: ManyMoose  Respond to of 769670
 
I don't have any trouble with identifying who is responsible for travesty.

It's the hubris of naysayers, whiners, antis and losers who rant about, giving aid and comfort to the enemy, doubt and confusion to the electorate, and resistance to leadership.

Doonesbury is a classic example.

It's so easy to criticize, so difficult to lead.