SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (217041)2/8/2007 10:21:09 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 281500
 
LOL. It could happen here, except that it would be more likely under Hillary than Edwards.

I've become fascinated with 17th century English politics -- well, from Henry VIII to William and Mary, which is somewhat more than the 17th century -- because Civil Wars about absolute monarchism vs. Parliamentarianism went back and forth for many decades.

I can't imagine the US being as polarized on issues as England was then, but we certainly have had our moments, see, e.g., slavery and the US Civil War.

When I was a child, we were indoctrinated heavily on the beauty of the United States Constitution, which I will support until my last breath.

I don't think the younger generations are taught to revere the Constitution anymore.

Well, my kids were, but they live in Virginia, the cradle of American freedom (ignoring slavery, of course).



To: Brumar89 who wrote (217041)2/9/2007 12:59:58 AM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Bush did open concentration camps and used secret prisons where innocent people could be held without due process and tortured. This is not what I want -- this is what you get when a President of the United States puts himself above the Constitution -- above the law. You get a sharp ugly move towards dictatorship.