Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (55)	2/9/2007 10:13:02 AM
From: Stan	Respond to of 25737

Maybe it's a good thing for him not to have big numbers now. If these early birds get into a royal rumble, they could wear out not only each other, but also their American audience, leaving, as others here have stated, dark horses to emerge. Newt could be one of them.

To: PROLIFE who wrote (55)	2/9/2007 10:20:01 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 25737

I agree... GZ

To: PROLIFE who wrote (55)	2/9/2007 10:26:46 AM
From: JDN	Respond to of 25737

I think its cause Newt has not yet announced, said he wont until September and probably never will if a candidate runs that meets his ideas of how things should be done. According to an analyst on Hannity and Colmes last night, IF Newt had been in the vote (the voted on the top 3) Newt would have come in second. As it was Rudy got 55%, Romney something like 35% and McCain only about 15% which was a surprise to me. Indicates to me a lot of independents and Democrats may have voted in the Fox poll. jdn