Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (217277)	2/9/2007 4:41:06 PM
From: Don Hurst	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

We need to trade weapons for hostages or something with these people asap. Where is Reagan now that we really need him?

To: one_less who wrote (217277)	2/9/2007 4:53:26 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Sounds like the braying of peaceful Iranians. When the overheated rhetoric is taken together with nuclear ambitions, the lesson of 9/11 must be kept at the forefront. And that lesson was: "Take them at their word." We cannot anymore brush aside the lunacy by believing that they are simply engaging in a culturally approved exhibition of rhetorical one-upmanship.

To: one_less who wrote (217277)	2/9/2007 5:01:36 PM
From: geode00	Respond to of 281500

Bush has called them the Axis of Evil. Ok, just 1/3rd of the Axis of Evil. He then goes to topple the government of 1/3rd of the Axis of Evil while threatening the other one with...negotiations. EEEKKKKK! Since NK took a much stronger stance -- actually having nukes rather than writing western novels --- than Saddam ever did, Iran is LOGICALLY going to lean toward the NK side of the rhetoric. You expect everyone to act irrationally when the only one who is irrational is you, Bush and your inane ilk.