Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (325450)	2/12/2007 2:05:07 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1577920

No one ever said in one year. Its 50% in 5 years. The phrase "50% turnover rate", normally means in a year. If you can set it to cover any arbitrary period than it becomes meaningless as every occupation has a 50% turnover rate over some period. And this is better how? A 50% turnover rate is horrendous whether its for new hires or existing staff. Its better because 50% turnover over 5 years for new hires only, isn't close to being as bad as 50% total turnover over one year (or even over 5). And yes a 50% turnover rate is horrendous, but it is irrelevant because the actual turnover rate, even for new hires, is lower than 50%.