SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kumar who wrote (217647)2/11/2007 9:22:20 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
no gift - India developed their technology whilst under US sanctions. they may b=have paid more than mkt value - I do not know.

What you seem to suggest is that India gains nothing from having a deal. I don't think the Indians are that stupid.

Northe Korea (from what I read in news) got its tech from Pakistan. No country has claimed to get its nuke tech from India (or Israel for that matter).

No country volunteers any illegal [or inappropriate] sales/purchasing of NW technologies. It's whether they get caught.

therefore NPT is a waste.

That's an absolutist's judgment. All or nothing. There was never a strategic arms agreement with the Soviet Union that abolished nuclear weapons. It doesn't follow that they were a waste. The very first SALT only hoped to slow down the insane arms race. Post missile Cuban Crisis, the hotline didn't eliminate the possibility of a nuclear exchange, it provided a mechanism in which the Soviets and US could communicate and avoid a nuclear exchange rather than play "chicken" like a couple of high school children. There's a bilateral agreement between the US and Russia to notify each other of a missile test. Which is a bit better than having NORAD guess whether it's real or not. An absolutist could claim that Russia would announce a "test" that was a real launch. When the trajectory isn't what the Russians said, they might claim it's a guidance failure, not to worry, it's only a test. The absolutist would argue those measure are all a waste.

jttmab



To: kumar who wrote (217647)2/11/2007 9:28:27 AM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
P.S. There was someone on this thread [I don't recall and don't care who it was.] who recently said that the US developed nuclear weapons and everyone else stole it from the US. In other words, India is too stupid to develop nuclear technology on its own. But that's their view FWIW.

jttmab



To: kumar who wrote (217647)2/11/2007 12:20:23 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
No country has claimed to get its nuke tech from India (or Israel for that matter).

South Africa got nuclear tech from Israel, in exchange for nuclear material and most likely the only actual test of an Israeli designed device off the coast of S. Africa.