SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mistermj who wrote (217808)2/11/2007 11:15:04 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I still chuckle at your post trying to justify the Nasdaq crash as nothing much...and then trying to hide it with chart manipulation.

The chuckling has to do with your senility. I didn't use or need no stinking charts. I used numbers and actual percentages.

You were misleading to begin with to compare the DOW against the NASDAQ, if you had a shred of integrity [which you don't] you would have compared the DOW to DOW.

The same with your widely derided chart of comparing average military deaths during the Clinton Administration against only Iraq deaths during the Bush Administration. You couldn't even use a chart that was consistent within itself.

jttmab



To: mistermj who wrote (217808)2/11/2007 11:44:54 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I still chuckle at your post trying to justify the Nasdaq crash as nothing much

What Nasdaq crash? I didn't see any crash, I saw a return to sane valuations. That's not a crash unless you bought at insane valuations, which is never very smart.



To: mistermj who wrote (217808)2/12/2007 12:38:37 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
It WASN'T all that much. The story of the Clinton years is what the DOW did:

3000 to 12000! The best time EVER for we investors..