Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (17636)	2/12/2007 5:06:52 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

Jefferson may have been a liberal by the meaning of the term at the time, but he was hardly a liberal in the modern sense of the term. He wasn't a fan of big intrusive government, particularly of an overly intrusive federal government. He and Madison wrote the "Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions" en.wikipedia.org Support of states rights, limited government... Hardly a "liberal Democrat". He also believed in a limited role for courts, going as far as to oppose Marbury v. Madison and the concept of judicial review. "To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves." Letter to William C. Jarvis, 1820 en.wikipedia.org