SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Katelew who wrote (218204)2/13/2007 3:23:46 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
You dont have a clue regarding economics, do you? No matter what the empirical evidence particularly regarding the positive effects of tax cuts, you continue your anti-reagan rant like all the unreconstructed socialist do-gooders among us. Reagan wasnt perfect but man you must have missed the 80s altogether or had a fling with Jimmy Carter perhaps.



To: Katelew who wrote (218204)2/13/2007 3:57:41 PM
From: mistermj  Respond to of 281500
 
Katelew...rather than trying to rewrite history perhaps your energies would be better spent on symbols of the Reagan legacy?

Its not too late, but given the news out of Poland and their want of Reagan statues, you better get going ;-)




To: Katelew who wrote (218204)2/13/2007 5:35:07 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
If the federal government was downsized, it would be very good for family income, indeed.

Which agencies or programs would you like to eliminate?

Me, I think I'd eliminate the Department of Education first.

And abolish agricultural subsidies, which would severely downsize the Department of Agriculture.

I'd also try to downsize the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and quit interfering with the rights of Indians living on reservations.