Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nortel Networks (NT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OrionX who wrote (14563)	2/14/2007 3:56:42 PM
From: waitwatchwander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14638

The legal settlement is old news ... I already sent you a PM stating that I thought the stock was going to go into a trading range. Didn't that PM arrive? Why wouldn't all the options and stock issued since the arrival of Mr. Z et al provide a downside cushion? Didn't you click on that tinyurl a way back and read a few of those FORM 4 filings. It was here ... Message 23282258 I see an SC 13G/A filing there also. It states that Brandes Investment Partners controls ~47M shares as of Dec 31st, 2006. How many shares are outstanding these days? They say their holding represent 10.78% of the common shares. Who is Brandes? Getting back to the range, given your "YUP" and technically astuteness isn't the top side obvious? Waiting might be a good idea but don't folks usually buy the rumour and sell the news? Or is it sell the rumour and buy the news? Go ahead throw up some more old news. Pretty soon it will have much less value than whatever gets stated in the coming weeks.