Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (196693)	2/16/2007 3:12:26 PM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794268

I think that the Republicans will have to look at not running the people who are deserting the party at this time. I don't know if that is possible, but inviting them to explain at nomination meetings why they turned their backs on American Troops might be a good way to start. Is it possible to Email them to invite them to explain that position?

To: KLP who wrote (196693)	2/16/2007 6:11:05 PM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794268

Isn't it interesting that re: the Dems who voted to approve the Iraq War in 2002 They approved the war. They approved every three and four star General who was promoted to conduct this war. They approved Petreaus. They approved numerous money bille to support the war. Now thay want us to believe they support the troops, they just don't support the plan. The plan was written under Petreaus' giudance. he approved it and briefed it at his confirmation. Yet they approved him anyway. How the hxxx is today supporting the troops? What troops do they support and how are they supporting them? Is Petreaus not a troop?