Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: energy_investor who wrote (7943)	2/16/2007 4:19:45 PM
From: roto	Respond to of 30218

the baby will get thrown out with the wash. to make up for big loses a wholesale sell off will include the uranium plays. an 'orderly evolution' is the ticket to successes. let us hope!

To: energy_investor who wrote (7943)	2/16/2007 5:25:50 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30218

I have about ten percent of our total family net worth in uranium, so I am not missing the boat at all. I won't mention exact amounts, but it's twice as much as I originally paid for our house. I have approximately the same amount in DBA, the agricultural commmodites fund, and about twice that much in the bear market funds. The rest is still in Canadian royalty trusts, especially COS.UN, qand a scattering of oddities, such as Gamehost, GH.UN, the company that owns the only casino in Fort McMurray and also hotels and restaurants.

To: energy_investor who wrote (7943)	2/16/2007 7:35:59 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30218

"if there is a market crash and everything takes a bath" not everything...real money won't so hedge an equal amount that you have in shares with physical silver and gold, never have cash in the bank that you aren't using. Gold will do a moonshot in a market crash because the fed would need to drop rates and thus the USD will tank. Silver will do a shot to Mars. Thats what I do. I see nothing to stop gold from hitting 1200 within 18 months.

To: energy_investor who wrote (7943)	2/17/2007 7:59:19 AM
From: CharlieChina	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30218

That was a good post,... for it is accurate,...

To: energy_investor who wrote (7943)	2/20/2007 2:22:36 AM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30218

Even though the world will still need Uranium, almost every Uranium stock could get clobbered except for CCJ. Most of these stocks have little institutional following. Pension funds which have money comming in every week will buy Intel INTC, Exxon XOM, Newmont NEM, and Genetech DNA. Then they may look at second and third tier stocks energy and mining stocks like DVN, EOG, CRZO, TXCO, PAAS, SSRI, PAL, etc. Small uranium stocks aren't on the list - otherwise the prices would already be much higher. We are getting these bargains because very few other investors are interested. This will change with time, just like it has with energy and metal stocks. But right now, this like 1999 was for energy stocks - most of the world isn't interested.